AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Gem › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
Four categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Gem, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 875 of the 1,008 answers collected in the four categories where Gem holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 875 answers that did not name Gem, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Recruiting CRM and sourcing

Talent acquisition. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Gem is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessGem is #9 of 12 here at 2% of first choices, 16 labels.

Seventy-two of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, twenty-five products in all, the eight most named:

17 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketGem is #1 of 10 here at 15% of first choices, 30 labels.

Sixty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in eight. The first choices in those sixty-one answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:

10 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseGem is #2 of 12 here at 14% of first choices, 29 labels.

Sixty-six of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in eight. The first choices in those sixty-six answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

9 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Talent intelligence

Performance and talent management. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Gem is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessGem is #4 of 16 here at 8% of first choices, 34 labels.

Fifty-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in four. The first choices in those fifty-nine answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

9 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketGem is #2 of 13 here at 14% of first choices, 24 labels.

Sixty-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in seven. The first choices in those sixty-seven answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

6 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseGem is #14 of 15 here at 0% of first choices, 11 labels.

Eighty of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

7 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Recruitment marketing and career sites

Talent acquisition. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Gem is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessGem holds 4 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-two of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those eighty-two answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

11 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketGem is #5 of 17 here at 7% of first choices, 12 labels.

Seventy-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in five. The first choices in those seventy-seven answers, twenty-one products in all, the eight most named:

13 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseGem holds 3 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those eighty-three answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:

Beamery10 of 83
Greenhouse4 of 83
Avature3 of 83
Bullhorn3 of 83
MokaHR3 of 83
Radancy3 of 83
10 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

AI recruiting assistants

Talent acquisition. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Gem is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessGem holds 5 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-two of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those eighty-two answers, twenty-two products in all, the eight most named:

14 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketGem is #5 of 15 here at 6% of first choices, 13 labels.

Seventy-five of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those seventy-five answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

7 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseGem is #6 of 13 here at 2% of first choices, 17 labels.

Seventy-one of the eighty-four answers did not name Gem; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those seventy-one answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

Eightfold AI21 of 71
HireVue3 of 71
GoPerfect2 of 71
Noon AI2 of 71
Phenom2 of 71
Fetcher1 of 71
HiredScore1 of 71
Noon1 of 71
9 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Gem neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Gem only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Gem's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Gem was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.