| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 22% | 1 of 136 | 0% | 25 | accepted challenger | |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 10% | 2 of 104 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+10Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 9% | 5 of 65 | 0% | 28 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 9% → 6%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 8% | 4 of 90 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 6% | 5 of 111 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 7% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 26 of 75 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 23 of 90 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 95 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 88 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 12 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most small businesses on a limited budget, Zoho Recruit (free tier), Breezy HR (free + $157/month), and Homebase (free + $25–$50/month) offer the best balance of price and functionality.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · first choice
“For companies with very limited budgets, Zoho Recruit or Breezy HR are excellent starting points since they offer robust free tiers.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Zoho Recruit if you have minimal hiring needs (under 10/year), or Manatal if you need more robust features” MiniMax M2.5 · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need a system from scratch: Choose Zoho Recruit. It provides the most feature-rich environment for $0–$50/month.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“budget-friendly, but less polished for larger recruiting operations” GPT-5.4 mini · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 322 of the 332 answers that named Zoho Recruit and are not a share of its labels.
1,000 of the 1,000 domain citations in answers naming Zoho Recruit came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Zoho Recruit's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoho.com/recruit, zoho.com/recruit/customers, zoho.com/recruit/userguide, zoho.com/recruit/healthcare, zoho.com/recruit/spark-hire.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Recruit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Recruit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho Recruit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Zoho Recruit first in Staffing agency platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Zoho Recruit is among the products AI models recommend first in Recruitment marketing and career sites this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.