Every category where a model named Breezy HR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	12%	2 of 65	4%	23	accepted challenger	▼−6Since September 2026: 18% → 12%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	7%	6 of 104	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23%	▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	2%	10 of 90	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31%	▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	29 of 75	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	0%	31 of 111	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Staffing agency platforms	Talent acquisition	0%	29 of 136	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22%
Employee onboarding	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	35 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	0%	26 of 66	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Breezy HR held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Applicant tracking syste · by segment

Small business▼−16Since September 2026: 41% → 25%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.

25%from 41% in September 2026

Cleared the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 of 47, unchanged

Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 18% → 12%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

12%from 18% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 of 54, unchanged

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 43 → 35 of 53

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Applicant tracking syste	18%	12%	▼−6Since September 2026: 18% → 12%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 2 of 65, unchanged
Recruitment marketing	0%	6%	▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 32 → 6 of 104
AI recruiting assistants	2%	0%	▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 11 → 10 of 90
Interview scheduling	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 54 → 29 of 75
Recruiting CRM	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 32 → 31 of 111
Staffing agency tools	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 29 of 136, unchanged
Employee onboarding	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 35 of 87, unchanged
Video interviewing	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 23 → 26 of 66

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Breezy HR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	5	0	1	6
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	4	0	6
Mistral Small	1	2	0	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	4	2	0	7
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	1	0	4
GPT-6 Luna	2	1	0	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct22 labels4

Paraphrase40 labels13

Comparative35 labels10not counted in share

Budget-constrained70 labels25

Scale-constrained11 labels1

Negative17 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative195 labels in all, every segment counted; 43 of the 54 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zoho Recruit (free tier), Breezy HR (free + $157/month), and Homebase ... offer the best balance of price and functionality” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Overall Value: Breezy HR ... The best choice for most small businesses looking for a robust yet affordable solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · first choice

“If you want the single best default pick for most budget-conscious small businesses, choose Breezy HR” Perplexity Sonar · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · first choice

“Zoho Recruit or Breezy HR are excellent starting points since they offer robust free tiers.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you have outgrown the basic "SMB" stage where a simple spreadsheet or lightweight tool (like JazzHR or Breezy HR) suffices” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Breezy HR, over the 195 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Breezy HR was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zoho Recruit111 of 19524Compare →

Workable110 of 19522Compare →

JazzHR108 of 19512Not among the top eight

Manatal70 of 19517Compare →

Greenhouse41 of 1959Compare →

Lever29 of 1954Compare →

100Hires26 of 1953Not among the top eight

BambooHR26 of 1950Not among the top eight

Recruitee25 of 1951Not among the top eight

Ashby20 of 1955Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Breezy HR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 189 of the 195 answers that named Breezy HR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pin.com88

capterra.com76

selectsoftwarereviews.com69

peoplemanagingpeople.com57

uschamber.com56

forbes.com53

resources.rework.com53

sparkhire.com47

zapier.com46

hiretruffle.com44

589 of the 589 domain citations in answers naming Breezy HR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

uschamber.com/co/run/human-resources/best-small-business-applicant-tracking-systems53

capterra.com/resources/best-applicant-tracking-system46

pinpointhq.com/insights/best-applicant-tracking-system42

zapier.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems40

pin.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems38

sparkhire.com/guides/the-best-applicant-tracking-system-for-small-business38

recruitee.com/blog/best-ats-smbs34

forbes.com/advisor/business/best-applicant-tracking-systems31

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

breezy.hr is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Breezy HR takes 12% of first choices and Greenhouse takes 40%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “applicant tracking system”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “applicant tracking systems”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 3,600 a month (“breezy hr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 59 a month
Its company's site: breezy.hr shared with Breezy's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 178,670 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 25,099 · 1,997 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 16,742
Paid Google search: 3 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $56 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

29+ ads · 24 text, 4 image, 1 video · 25 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2023, as Parkland Ambulance Service Inc. (d/b/a Mohawk Ambulance Service), verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 7 in the year, 22 before. 91 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

12%

rank 2 of 65 in applicant tracking syste

Segment leader

40%

Greenhouse

First choices: 43 across its categories
Named in: 195 answers
Its own site cited: in 189 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Breezy HR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Breezy HR; a claim can dispute any of them.

BreezyHR 3Breezy HR (Free ATS Tier) 1

Follow Breezy HR

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Breezy is the company behind Breezy HR.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Good HR tools are like PB&J—better together. 🥪 Learn how partnering with Breezy is a treat for both you and your clients.
help.breezy.hr/en/articles/16359331-breezy-partnerships
For: HR pro
help.breezy.hr/en/articles/16359331-breezy-partnerships
Price stated: As a Breezy Reseller, HR service providers receive a 25% discount on Breezy subscriptions for their clients. help.breezy.hr/en/articles/16359331-breezy-partnerships
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Breezy HR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: help.breezy.hr/en/articles/16793775-breezy-ui-refresh, help.breezy.hr/en/articles/16359331-breezy-partnerships, help.breezy.hr/en/articles/13379216-mega-hr-integration, help.breezy.hr/es/articles/5578138-comenzando-con-breezy, help.breezy.hr/es/articles/8832575-que-es-breezy-perform. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Breezy HR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Breezy HR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Breezy HR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Breezy HR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Breezy HR, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Breezy HR is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Breezy HR is among the products AI models recommend first in Applicant tracking systems this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/applicant-tracking-systems/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/breezy-hr--applicant-tracking-systems-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Applicant tracking systems, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Applicant tracking systems standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/applicant-tracking-systems/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/breezy-hr--applicant-tracking-systems-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Applicant tracking systems, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Applicant tracking systems standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/applicant-tracking-systems/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/breezy-hr--applicant-tracking-systems-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Applicant tracking systems, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Applicant tracking systems standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.