Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 7% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 91
9 categories · RankedJazzHR
215Judge labels
19First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
9Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Applicant tracking syste for small business buyers
Rank 17 of 104 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of JazzHR →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 99
11%34 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market17 of 104
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named JazzHR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 2% | 17 of 104 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 13 of 65 | 9% | 23 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 33 of 111 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 36 of 136 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% | |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 33 of 75 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 45 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 69 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 62 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 32 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, JazzHR held within the floor in all nine categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 29 → 17 of 94
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 17 of 104 |
| Applicant tracking syste | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 13 of 65 |
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 111, unchanged |
| Staffing agency tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 136, unchanged |
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 64 → 33 of 75 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 90, unchanged |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 69 of 142, unchanged |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 90, unchanged |
| Video interviewing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated JazzHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated JazzHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels5
Paraphrase36 labels7
Comparative44 labels14not counted in share
Budget-constrained67 labels6
Scale-constrained15 labels1
Negative26 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative215 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the strongest single pick from the results is JazzHR because it is repeatedly positioned as a small-business-friendly option” Perplexity Sonar · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“JazzHR is designed for small and growing businesses and combines intuitive job posting distribution across 20+ job boards with customizable branded career pages” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“If the main goal is to keep costs down, look at JazzHR, Zoho Recruit, or similar budget-friendly ATS/recruiting tools” GPT-5.4 mini · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for small teams on a modest fixed monthly plan: JazzHR at $75/month annually” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Basic SMB tools (JazzHR) - may not scale with your needs” Kimi K2 · Applicant tracking syste · scale prompt · hard negative
“you have outgrown the basic "SMB" stage where a simple spreadsheet or lightweight tool (like JazzHR or Breezy HR) suffices” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as JazzHR, over the 215 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JazzHR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as JazzHR, over the 215 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JazzHR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JazzHR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 210 of the 215 answers that named JazzHR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pin.com97
capterra.com90
selectsoftwarereviews.com89
resources.rework.com70
jazzhr.comYour site66
peoplemanagingpeople.com65
g2.com64
hiretruffle.com57
forbes.com55
pinpointhq.com52
639 of the 705 domain citations in answers naming JazzHR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
jazzhr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, JazzHR takes 2% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
jazzhr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, JazzHR takes 2% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “recruitment marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 14,800 a month (“jazzhr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 70 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,754 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,588 · 89 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 16,499
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 17 of 104 in recruitment marketing
Segment leader
23%
Teamtailor
- First choices
- 19 across its categories
- Named in
- 215 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 210 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jazzhr.com
901
subdomains included
Content
452
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
9 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 427 | 12 | 2026-09-10 | Applicant tracking syste, Video interviewing | |
| Comparison | 15 | 7 | 2026-08-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2025-05-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2022-01-13 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2021-04-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-10How to write a job posting blog
- 2026-09-08Job posting cost blog
- 2026-09-06Niche job boards blog
- 2026-09-04Post to multiple job boards blog
- 2026-09-03How jazzhr is giving growing teams a better way to hire results from the hackett group r 2026 talent acquisition vendor blog
- 2026-09-02Hire grounds stefo johnson blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jazzhr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as JazzHR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as JazzHR; a claim can dispute any of them.
JazzHR (Hero Plan) 1
Follow JazzHR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
JazzHR is its own company.ShowHide
The company
JazzHR is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- powerful, user-friendly recruiting software that helps small businesses find and hire talent fast
- For
- small businesses
- Price stated
- budget-friendly, especially for small to mid-sized businesses jazzhr.com
- Starting price
- 1000 jazzhr.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Spin up JazzHR free for 14 days. No credit card. No spreadsheets. jazzhr.com/case-studies
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001GDPRCCPA
- Hosting
- US-East1US-East2US-West2US-EAST region
- Customers named
- Rep-LitePalm Medical CentersSmartChoiceAO Globe LifeGuerra Wealth AdvisorsBroadstreet PropertiesFairfax Radiology CentersPaws & Claws
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What JazzHR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jazzhr.com, jazzhr.com/pricing, jazzhr.com/security, jazzhr.com/solutions/employer-branding, jazzhr.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JazzHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JazzHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for JazzHR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where JazzHR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name JazzHR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.