| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 22% | 2 of 136 | 28% | 50 | criticized challenger | |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 28 of 104 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 18 of 65 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 57 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 66 of 121 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by VectorVMS at 16% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 103 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Bullhorn or TempWorks if you are a traditional staffing business looking to manage your database, clients, and back-office payroll in-house.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · first choice
“Bullhorn remains the long-standing enterprise CRM and ATS for staffing and recruitment agencies globally with strong on automation and deep integrations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · first choice
“Bullhorn is the go‑to all‑in‑one platform for agencies that want a widely adopted system with strong AI and communication tools.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · first choice
“It is widely considered the "industry standard." ... Choose Bullhorn if: You are scaling fast, need strict Salesforce integration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Bullhorn: Avoid if you're a small agency and cannot justify the enterprise-oriented scope or validate the exact package.” Llama 4 Maverick · Staffing agency tools · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Bullhorn unless you need enterprise-grade compliance features or have 50+ users—it's overkill and overpriced” Kimi K2 · Staffing agency tools · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid platforms like Bullhorn or JobDiva initially” Kimi K2 · Staffing agency tools · budget prompt · hard negative
“best suited to mid-large staffing agencies that have the resources to implement, configure and manage a mature recruitment platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 201 of the 208 answers that named Bullhorn and are not a share of its labels.
570 of the 625 domain citations in answers naming Bullhorn came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 3,544 | 12 | 2026-09-18 | Applicant tracking syste, Workforce management sui | |
| News or press | 796 | 0 | 2018-03-13 | Applicant tracking syste, AI recruiting assistants | |
| Conference or event | 335 | 0 | 2023-07-05 | Pay equity | |
| Case study | 262 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 178 | 0 | 2023-09-21 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Glossary or explainer | 154 | 0 | 2026-05-02 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Report or ebook | 15 | 0 | 2022-01-24 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2018-09-18 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 0 | 2021-08-30 |
As the event pages on bullhorn.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page bullhorn.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Bullhorn's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: bullhorn.com, bullhorn.com/pricing-v1, bullhorn.com/security, bullhorn.com/products, bullhorn.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bullhorn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bullhorn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bullhorn by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Bullhorn is among the products AI models recommend first in Staffing agency platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.