Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 52 → 40 of 40
11 categories · RankedHireVue
377Judge labels
42First choices
176Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
11Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
66% in Video interviewing for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 66 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 60% of its 48 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of HireVue →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business42 of 42
0%35 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market8 of 66
4%48 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 40
66%70 labels
endorsed leader
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HireVue for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 4% | 8 of 66 | 60% | 48 | criticized challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 2% | 13 of 90 | 35% | 23 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 33 of 118 | 32% | 19 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 67 of 75 | 40% | 10 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 142 of 142 | 100% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 71 of 71 | 71% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 88 of 90 | 67% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 107 of 114 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 77 of 104 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 86 of 97 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 39 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HireVue held within the floor in all eleven categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 39 → 7 of 63
Enterprise▼−8Since September 2026: 74% → 66%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
66%from 74% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 1 of 38, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 0% | 5% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 39 → 8 of 66 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 71 → 13 of 90 |
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 33 of 118 |
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 67 of 75 |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 109 → 142 of 142 |
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 71 of 71 |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 72 → 88 of 90 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 107 of 114 |
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 77 of 104 |
| HR compliance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 86 of 97, unchanged |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 102, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HireVue across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HireVue across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 14 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 12 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 11 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 10 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct46 labels17
Paraphrase53 labels17
Comparative94 labels21not counted in share
Budget-constrained34 labels5
Scale-constrained28 labels3
Negative122 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative377 labels in all, every segment counted; 42 of the 63 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“HireVue | Enterprise-scale structured interviews | AI-driven, live + async, solid for 500-person companies expanding” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · scale prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: HireVue ... For mid-market companies looking for structure and data, it is the safest bet.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video interviewing · direct prompt · first choice
“HireVue and VidCruiter lead in enterprise‑grade AI assessments and compliance, with higher price points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you're an enterprise hiring at massive scale and want science-backed, defensible AI assessments: HireVue” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The Case of HireVue: HireVue is one of the largest enterprise video hiring tools, but it has faced intense scrutiny.... the ACLU filed an EEOC complaint against Intuit and HireVue” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Facial analysis in video interviews flagged for bias FTC investigation... ACLU Colorado filed a complaint with the EEOC... against Intuit, Inc. and its AI vendor HireVue.†},{” Muse Glimmer 30B · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · hard negative
“EEOC charges filed in March of 2025, where a deaf indigenous applicant claims that the HireVue automated video software used by Intuit lacked proper captioning” Claude Haiku 4.5 · HR AI assistants · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid or Approach with Caution ### HireVue - Why be cautious: Face intense criticism for facial-expression analysis and AI bias” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video interviewing · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HireVue, over the 377 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HireVue was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HireVue, over the 377 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HireVue was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HireVue. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 357 of the 377 answers that named HireVue and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hiretruffle.com137
pin.com114
hirevire.com113
willo.video96
firsthr.app94
selectsoftwarereviews.com91
g2.com90
peoplemanagingpeople.com87
resources.rework.com77
linkedin.com64
963 of the 963 domain citations in answers naming HireVue came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hirevue.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, HireVue takes 4% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hirevue.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, HireVue takes 4% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 14,800 a month (“hirevue”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,147 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 35,611 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,922 · 406 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,875
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 8 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 42 across its categories
- Named in
- 377 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 357 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hirevue.com
1,156
subdomains included
Content
1,044
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
34 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 579 | 2 | 2026-09-16 | Video interviewing, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Podcast or video | 123 | 0 | 2026-01-30 | Video interviewing | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 96 | 3 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 81 | 0 | 2026-04-23 | Video interviewing | |
| Case study | 74 | 32 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| News or press | 63 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 15 | 0 | 2024-04-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2023-05-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-07-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16How nestle and hirevue are transforming early careers ta blog
- 2026-09-09Deloitte case study
- 2026-09-09Abf freight systems case study
- 2026-09-09Virgin australia case study
- 2026-09-09Heathrow case study
- 2026-09-09Chevron federal credit union case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hirevue.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as HireVue
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HireVue; a claim can dispute any of them.
Hirevue 2HireVue (Interview Scheduling) 1HireVue Scheduling / Coordinate 1
Follow HireVue
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HireVue is its own company.ShowHide
The company
HireVue is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI hiring technology to reveal proven skills and capabilities
- For
- talent acquisition teams
- Integrations claimed
- 45 hirevue.com
- Certifications
- SOCISOFedRampSOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001:2013GDPR compliantFedRAMP CertifiedISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Customers named
- IkeaSchneider ElectricPacific LifeSwire Coca-ColaTJX.comDeltaWalmartEmirates
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What HireVue's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hirevue.com, hirevue.com/pricing, trust.hirevue.com, hirevue.com/platform, hirevue.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HireVue's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HireVue, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HireVue by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HireVue is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HireVue, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.