Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 of 108, unchanged
7 categories · RankedPinpoint
57Judge labels
8First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Applicant tracking syste for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 111 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Pinpoint →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market12 of 111
4%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In recruiting crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pinpoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 4% | 12 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 3% | 7 of 65 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 29 of 104 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 68 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 45 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26% | |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 53 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 60 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pinpoint held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruiting CRM · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 111, unchanged |
| Recruitment marketing | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 29 of 104 |
| Applicant tracking syste | 4% | 4% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 65, unchanged |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 68 of 90, unchanged |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 66, unchanged |
| Job advertising | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 53 of 111, unchanged |
| Staffing agency tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pinpoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pinpoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels2
Paraphrase15 labels3
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained11 labels2
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Pinpoint is the safest choice for a typical mid-sized B2B company's recruiting CRM needs” Perplexity Sonar · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Pinpoint: Known for its flexibility and mid-market/enterprise focus.” Llama 4 Maverick · Applicant tracking syste · scale prompt · first choice
“Pinpoint ⭐ Best Overall for Mid-Market” Kimi K2 · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Greenhouse and Pinpoint are top choices” Mistral Small · Applicant tracking syste · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pinpoint, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pinpoint was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pinpoint, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pinpoint was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pinpoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 57 answers that named Pinpoint and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pinpointhq.comYour site45
pin.com29
gem.com20
lever.co18
peoplemanagingpeople.com17
resources.rework.com17
selectsoftwarereviews.com17
zapier.com17
greenhouse.com16
sparkhire.com15
166 of the 211 domain citations in answers naming Pinpoint came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pinpointhq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pinpoint takes 4% of first choices and Gem takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pinpointhq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pinpoint takes 4% of first choices and Gem takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “candidate sourcing tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 27,100 a month (“pinpoint”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3,146 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 118,527 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,299 · 1,140 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,818
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 12 of 111 in Recruiting CRM
Segment leader
15%
Gem
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 57 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 57 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pinpointhq.com
589
subdomains included
Content
186
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
42 · 177
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 133 | 20 | 2026-09-23 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Case study | 29 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 19 | 0 | 2026-02-04 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Ai recruiting use cases blog
- 2026-09-22Gdpr compliant ats blog
- 2026-09-21Ai recruiting automation blog
- 2026-09-03Best ai applicant tracking system blog
- 2026-09-01Applicant tracking system features blog
- 2026-08-30Agentic ai recruiting blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pinpointhq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Pinpoint
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pinpoint is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pinpoint is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Leading Global Applicant Tracking System
- For
- TA teams
- Price stated
- Pinpoint pricing is tailored to your organization's size and hiring needs, so we quote on request rather than publishing a fixed price. pinpointhq.com/platform-overview
- Integrations claimed
- 100 pinpointhq.com
- Certifications
- ISOSOCISO 42001ISO 27001SOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- UKEuropean data centers
- Customers named
- Blue CrossLushcitizenMDavies GroupTata ChemicalsGeorgia Institute of TechnologyCDLGrant Thornton
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial
What Pinpoint's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pinpointhq.com, trust.pinpointhq.com, pinpointhq.com/platform-overview, pinpointhq.com/case-studies, pinpointhq.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pinpoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pinpoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pinpoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pinpoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pinpoint, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.