| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 2% | 13 of 127 | 24% | 17 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 90 of 90 | 60% | 15 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 83 of 102 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 81 of 114 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 118 → 13 of 127 |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 76 → 90 of 90 |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 99 → 83 of 102 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 81 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you already use Workday, start with Workday Skills Cloud: it maps skills across the organization” GPT-6 Luna · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“check your current HRIS (e.g., Workday, HiBob, or SuccessFactors). Many have rolled out native "Skills Cloud" or talent intelligence features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Skills intelligence · scale prompt · alternative
“Skills intelligence natively embedded within the Workday HRIS ... Best if you're already on Workday.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Workday if you want native integration with an existing Workday environment.” GPT-5.4 mini · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“offering very little value to recruiters who are tasked with sourcing net-new external B2B talent” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · hard negative
“Why avoid platforms like Eightfold, Gloat, or Workday? ... Workday is too expensive and rigid” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“avoid if you need external talent acquisition... zero external sourcing capability” Perplexity Sonar · Talent intelligence · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise-heavy like Workday Skills Cloud (too pricey/integrated)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 117 of the 121 answers that named Workday Skills Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
329 of the 329 domain citations in answers naming Workday Skills Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Workday Skills Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/de-de/workday-innovative-cloud-hcm-loesung.html, workday.com/fr-fr/workday-innovative-cloud-hcm-solution.html, workday.com/en-sg/pages/cloud-technology.html, workday.com/en-us/pages/workday-cloud-platform-apps.html, workday.com/fr-fr/pages/erp-workday-enterprise-management-cloud.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Skills Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Skills Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Skills Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: