Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 3 of 100
5 categories · RankedMetaview
66Judge labels
8First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Talent intelligence for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 90 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Metaview →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 104
10%22 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 90
4%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise45 of 68
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In talent intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Metaview for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 4% | 7 of 90 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 20 of 90 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 40 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 20 of 66 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 76 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Metaview held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Talent intelligence · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 7 of 80
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 → 39 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 20 of 90 |
| Recruiting CRM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 40 of 111 |
| Talent intelligence | 6% | 5% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 7 of 90 |
| Video interviewing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 20 of 66 |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 142, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Metaview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Metaview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels3
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative22 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels4
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you primarily need to organize internal data and interview feedback, start with Metaview's free plan.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with hireEZ or Metaview” MiniMax M2.5 · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“Metaview covers sourcing, interview capture, scorecards, and outreach in a single platform built specifically for recruiting” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI recruiting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your primary bottleneck isn't *finding* candidates, but rather *interviewing and evaluating* them objectively” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Talent intelligence · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Metaview, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Metaview was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Metaview, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Metaview was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Metaview. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 66 answers that named Metaview and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pin.com51
metaview.aiYour site41
skima.ai34
learn.g2.com29
g2.com26
guideflow.com22
linkedin.com18
hiretruffle.com17
peoplemanagingpeople.com17
xobin.com16
230 of the 271 domain citations in answers naming Metaview came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
metaview.ai ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Metaview takes 4% of first choices and Pin takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
metaview.ai ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Metaview takes 4% of first choices and Pin takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “talent intelligence platform”
2
Position for “talent intelligence platforms”
1
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“metaview”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 49 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 39,923 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,356 · 615 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,093
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 704 clicks and $9,200 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 90 in talent intelligence
Segment leader
27%
Pin
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 66 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 66 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on metaview.ai
1,624
subdomains included
Content
931
counted in the table below
Documentation
146
Product · Integration
0 · 133
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 749 | 44 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 61 | 14 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 58 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 42 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 9 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2026-01-30 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2020-12-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2020-11-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Best bullhorn crm integrations blog
- 2026-09-22Best email finder tools recruiters blog
- 2026-09-22Indeed alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-21Developer sourcing tools technical recruiters blog
- 2026-09-16Eightfold ai alternatives competitors comparison
- 2026-09-15Paradox alternatives competitors comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page metaview.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Metaview
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Metaview is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Metaview is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Agentic Recruiting Platform built for radically efficient hiring, end to end.
- For
- Anyone involved in hiring. Recruiters, hiring managers, and executive search partners all use Metaview. So do Fortune 500s, fast-growing startups, industries, and recruiting agencies.
- Price stated
- you only use and pay for the agents you need metaview.ai
- Starting price
- 0 metaview.ai/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free metaview.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 62 metaview.ai/integrations
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPALGPDPIPEDASOC 2 Type IIDASAEU AI ActSOC 2 Type 2
- Hosting
- UKUSEUAWS UK environment
- Customers named
- ReplitQontoDELIVEROOWorkleapEngineAutomatticCatawikiOctopus Energy
What Metaview's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: metaview.ai, metaview.ai/pricing, trust.metaview.ai, metaview.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Metaview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Metaview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Metaview by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Metaview is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Metaview, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.