| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 47% | 1 of 102 | 12% | 41 | endorsed leader | ▲+19Since September 2026: 26% → 45%, +19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 6% | 5 of 90 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 4% | 8 of 127 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 23 of 98 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 84 of 89 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 38 of 93 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketpl | 26% | 45% | ▲+19Since September 2026: 26% → 45%, +19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 of 102, unchanged |
| Talent intelligence | 4% | 7% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 5 of 90 |
| Skills intelligence | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 8 of 127 |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 98, unchanged |
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 53 → 84 of 89 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 41 → 38 of 93 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For mid-market companies specifically, Fuel50 and Eightfold tend to be the most commonly recommended options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · first choice
“Fuel50 is the best default recommendation for a mid-market B2B company looking for an internal talent marketplace” Perplexity Sonar · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · first choice
“Fuel50 and Engagedly are frequently highlighted as top choices for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · first choice
“Recommendation 1: Fuel50 Best Overall for True Talent Mobility & Personalized Career Paths” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid enterprise-heavy ones like Gloat, Cornerstone, or Fuel50—they're quote-based/custom” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · hard negative
“Steer clear of enterprise platforms (Gloat, Workday, Fuel50)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid: ... Fuel50” Kimi K2 · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · hard negative
“vendors such as Fuel50 sell by employee count and selected modules, but require a quote—so confirm the total cost before investing time in a sales process” GPT-6 Luna · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 200 of the 206 answers that named Fuel50 and are not a share of its labels.
554 of the 645 domain citations in answers naming Fuel50 came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 241 | 13 | 2026-09-24 | Internal talent marketpl, Succession planning | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 73 | 6 | 2026-09-24 | Skills intelligence, Internal talent marketpl | |
| News or press | 63 | 5 | 2026-09-24 | Skills intelligence | |
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2026-05-06 | Skills intelligence | |
| Comparison | 9 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | Skills intelligence | |
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-11-17 |
Every page fuel50.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Fuel50's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: fuel50.com, fuel50.com/pricing, trust.fuel50.com, fuel50.com/platform-overview. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fuel50's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fuel50, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fuel50 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Fuel50 first in Internal talent marketplace this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.