Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
2 categories · RankedRadancy
57Judge labels
4First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Job advertising for enterprise buyers
Rank 103 of 104 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 57% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market103 of 104
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 78
3%21 labels
accepted challenger
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Radancy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 103 of 104 | 57% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 82 of 111 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Radancy held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 51 → 93 of 94
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 10 of 73
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 51 → 103 of 104 |
| Job advertising | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 77 → 82 of 111 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Radancy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Radancy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative15 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels2
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“validate the specific integration and customization work you need in a live demo; G2's review summary mentions limitations in those areas” GPT-6 Luna · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“enterprise solutions like Phenom, Beamery, and Radancy typically require $20,000–$50,000+ annual commitments” Llama 4 Maverick · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · soft negative
“No public pricing transparency... Heavy reliance on managed services rather than self-serve.” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Ongoing fees less ideal for sporadic posting” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Radancy, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Radancy was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Radancy, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Radancy was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Radancy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 57 answers that named Radancy and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com31
joveo.com27
hrtechsaas.com25
selectsoftwarereviews.com25
guideflow.com19
learn.g2.com15
intervue.io14
adway.ai13
worldmetrics.org13
resources.rework.com12
194 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming Radancy came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
radancy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Radancy takes 0% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
radancy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Radancy takes 0% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “recruitment marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“radancy”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 36 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,692 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 591 · 88 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,626
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 103 of 104 in recruitment marketing
Segment leader
23%
Teamtailor
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 57 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 56 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on radancy.com
1,123
subdomains included
Content
830
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
23 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 735 | 10 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 33 | 7 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 8 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| News or press | 14 | 5 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 0 | 2025-07-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2023-08-01 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24The buyers guide to intelligent career site technology 2 report or ebook
- 2026-09-23Beyond ai adoption building ai maturity for workday customers blog
- 2026-09-23Connecting workday and programmatic advertising for smarter hiring blog
- 2026-09-23Why candidate drop off starts before candidates ever reach workday blog
- 2026-09-18Press coverage news or press
- 2026-09-18Radancy stellt agentic ai fur die talent acquisition vor news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page radancy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Radancy
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Radancy is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Radancy is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Talent Acquisition Platform powered by Agentic AI
- For
- global employers
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Radancy's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: radancy.com, radancy.com/solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Radancy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Radancy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Radancy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Radancy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Radancy, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.