Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 71 → 87 of 91
iCIMS · 1 category · RankediCIMS Attract
50Judge labels
4First choices
15Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Recruitment marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 25 of 104 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 31% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of iCIMS Attract →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business95 of 99
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 104
0%13 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise3 of 78
7%29 labels
accepted challenger
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named iCIMS Attract for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 25 of 104 | 31% | 13 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, iCIMS Attract held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 23 of 94
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 73
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 25 of 104 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated iCIMS Attract across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated iCIMS Attract across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labels3
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“iCIMS is a major talent acquisition suite that has layered top-tier recruitment marketing capabilities over its core ATS.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large corporations wanting an ATS + recruitment marketing in one integrated suite” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“iCIMS has offerings that scale well for mid-sized companies with high growth targets” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“iCIMS is better suited for mid-market to large enterprises” Perplexity Sonar · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise tools like Phenom, Beamery, and iCIMS are powerful but may be overkill for 100–300 employees” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · soft negative
“iCIMS - Better for larger enterprises, comprehensive but more expensive” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Widely used but with notable caveats: Steep learning curve” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“High learning curve, limited customization.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iCIMS Attract, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iCIMS Attract was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iCIMS Attract, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iCIMS Attract was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iCIMS Attract. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 50 answers that named iCIMS Attract and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hrtechsaas.com27
resources.rework.com27
sprad.io22
g2.com20
selectsoftwarereviews.com20
joveo.com18
mokahr.io17
herohunt.ai14
hr-ai-index.com13
learn.g2.com13
191 of the 191 domain citations in answers naming iCIMS Attract came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
icims.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iCIMS Attract takes 0% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
icims.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iCIMS Attract takes 0% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “recruitment marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“icims attract”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- icims.com shared with iCIMS's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,165,712 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 53,014 · 6,657 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 32,167
- Paid Google search
- 6 searches its ads show for, about 73 clicks and $5,674 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 104 in recruitment marketing
Segment leader
23%
Teamtailor
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 50 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 48 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as iCIMS Attract
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iCIMS Attract; a claim can dispute any of them.
iCIMS 12iCIMS (Talent Cloud) 1
Follow iCIMS Attract
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
iCIMS is the company behind iCIMS Attract.ShowHide
The company
iCIMS is the company behind iCIMS Attract.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from iCIMS
- iCIMS Internal Mobility, iCIMS Talent Cloud
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Make the most of your ATS database with fully automated recruitment marketing campaigns.
- For
- talent acquisition leaders
- Customers named
- The Cheesecake Factory
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What iCIMS Attract's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: icims.com/recruitment-marketing-playbook-gated, icims.com/icims-marketing-automation-webinar-series, icims.com/recruitment-marketing-play-reactivate-disengaged-talent-pools, icims.com/recruitment-marketing-play-nurture-your-talent-community-members, icims.com/glossary/recruitment-marketing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iCIMS Attract's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iCIMS Attract, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iCIMS Attract by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where iCIMS Attract is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name iCIMS Attract, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.