| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 12% | 3 of 111 | 10% | 31 | accepted challenger | ▼−10Since September 2026: 21% → 11%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 21 of 104 | 14% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 25 of 75 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 60 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising | 21% | 11% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 21% → 11%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 111 |
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 21 of 104 |
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 47 → 25 of 75 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 60 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Joveo is a pioneer in "programmatic" recruitment marketing... Choose Joveo or Symphony if your biggest pain point is paying too much for job ads” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Joveo is the most commonly recommended programmatic job advertising platform in current market discussions.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Job advertising · direct prompt · first choice
“Overall positioning: Joveo leads for AI-powered, end-to-end programmatic job advertising and analytics.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Joveo is the strongest choice due to its superior ratings, feature depth, and value” Kimi K2 · Job advertising · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“high minimum media spends (which typically start at $2,000 to $5,000+ per month for enterprise-grade Demand-Side Platforms like Joveo or Appcast Enterprise)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · budget prompt · soft negative
“"Some users note onboarding and setup effort is higher than expected." "Pricing transparency for full stack implementation is limited"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“can lead to an overwhelming number of unqualified candidates and may not be cost-effective for all types of positions” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“enterprise heavyweights like *Appcast* and *Joveo* are industry giants” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 143 of the 143 answers that named Joveo and are not a share of its labels.
429 of the 515 domain citations in answers naming Joveo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 537 | 22 | 2026-09-23 | Recruitment marketing, Job advertising | |
| Podcast or video | 52 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| News or press | 49 | 2 | 2026-09-22 | Talent intelligence, Recruitment marketing | |
| Comparison | 30 | 22 | 2026-08-21 | Applicant tracking syste, Recruitment marketing | |
| Case study | 29 | 1 | 2026-07-11 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | 10 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2025-06-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2025-11-07 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2025-12-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2021-05-17 |
As the event pages on joveo.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page joveo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Joveo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: joveo.com, trust.joveo.com, joveo.com/resource-category/solutions, joveo.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Joveo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Joveo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Joveo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Joveo is among the products AI models recommend first in Job advertising and distribution this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.