AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Gem · October 2026 Edition
7 categories · Ranked

Gem

221Judge labels
40First choices
19Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Recruiting CRM for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Gem →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In recruiting crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gem for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Recruiting CRM and sourcingTalent acquisition15%1 of 1113%30accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Talent intelligencePerformance and talent management14%2 of 908%24accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 15% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Recruitment marketing and career sitesTalent acquisition7%5 of 1048%12accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI recruiting assistantsTalent acquisition6%5 of 900%13accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition2%15 of 750%3under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20%▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Applicant tracking systemsTalent acquisition0%17 of 650%7under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Staffing agency platformsTalent acquisition0%30 of 1360%3under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22%

Movement

Since September 2026, Gem held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Recruiting CRM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 10 → 11 of 108
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 18% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 108
Enterprise▲+6Since September 2026: 10% → 16%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 → 2 of 72

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI recruiting assistants2%7%▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 5 of 90
Recruitment marketing2%6%▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 12 → 5 of 104
Recruiting CRM18%15%▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 → 1 of 111
Interview scheduling4%2%▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 15 of 75
Talent intelligence15%16%▲+2Since September 2026: 15% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 of 90, unchanged
Applicant tracking syste0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 29 → 17 of 65
Staffing agency tools0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 30 of 136, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Gem across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512014
GPT-5.4 mini10102
Gemini 3.5 Flash661114
Perplexity Sonar153110
Grok 4.1 Fast23207
Mistral Small30115
DeepSeek V4 Flash334010
Llama 4 Maverick01506
Qwen 3.7 Flash36009
Kimi K213408
GLM 4.7 FlashX14005
MiniMax M2.512003
GPT-6 Luna22004
Muse Glimmer 30B04105

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct64 labels25
Paraphrase12 labels1
Comparative74 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained31 labels8
Scale-constrained23 labels6
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative221 labels in all, every segment counted; 40 of the 45 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Gem is the best overall due to its strong automation, CRM, and AI features, as well as its high user satisfaction and mid-market focus.” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · first choice
“Gem (formerly HireEZ) is widely considered the best all-around candidate sourcing tool for this specific size and sector today.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruiting CRM · direct prompt · first choice
“Gem is widely considered the best option for small businesses because they have a specific pricing tier designed to help you grow” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
“Look for modern, agile platforms (such as Gem, Clinch, or Teamtailor) where implementation takes weeks, not quarters.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“faces integration issues with some third-party systems and occasionally has UI and workflow clunkiness” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Talent intelligence · negative prompt · hard negative
“premium enterprise platforms like LinkedIn Recruiter Corporate, Gem, or hireEZ can cost thousands of dollars annually per seat” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruiting CRM · budget prompt · soft negative
“positioned more for outbound recruiting and pipeline management than broad talent intelligence” Perplexity Sonar · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · soft negative
“they may not be beneficial if your recruitment pipelines are already cold or inactive” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gem, over the 221 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gem was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SeekOut110 of 22110Compare →
Beamery75 of 2216Not among the top eight
Pin63 of 22127Compare →
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gem. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 209 of the 221 answers that named Gem and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pin.com136
lever.co76
metaview.ai76
g2.com68
gem.comYour site63
selectsoftwarereviews.com63
skima.ai63
learn.g2.com56
noon.ai53
guideflow.com51

642 of the 705 domain citations in answers naming Gem came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Gem stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “candidate sourcing tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
246,000 a month (“gem”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
225,116 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 16,291 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,101 · 305 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,056
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 0 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 107 text, 7 image, 6 video · 10 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2025, as GEM SOFTWARE, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 105 in the year, 15 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
15%
rank 1 of 111 in Recruiting CRM
First choices
40
across its categories
Named in
221 answers
Its own site cited
in 209 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on gem.com
9,422
subdomains included
Content
459
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,150
Product · Integration
19 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog31712026-08-04
Report or ebook3402025-10-22
Comparison2802026-01-14
Case study2502026-06-09
Glossary or explainer2002026-02-27
Webinar or virtual event1922026-08-06
Conference or event10undated
Template or tool502026-01-07
News or press1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page gem.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Gem

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gem; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gem (formerly HireEZ) 1Gem (with Gem AI Sourcing) 1

Follow Gem

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Gem is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI-first all-in-one recruiting platform — ATS, CRM, sourcing, scheduling, and analytics.
For
talent acquisition teams
Price stated
Flexible pricing based on your needs. Early-stage startups get their first six months free through Gem's Startup Program, with 50% off the first paid year — starting as low as $135/month for the full platform. Enterprise teams on Greenhouse or Workday can add Gem's AI agents with custom pricing. gem.com
Starting price
135 gem.com
Free plan or trial
first six months free through Gem's Startup Program gem.com
Customers named
OneMedicalCelesticaeBayGitLabAmazon OneMedicalAnthropicRobinhoodFigma
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Gem's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gem.com, gem.com/pricing, trust.gem.com, gem.com/product/crm, gem.com/company/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gem's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gem, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gem by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Gem is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gem, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gem.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Gem is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide
Recruiting CRM and sourcing

AI models recommend Gem first in Recruiting CRM and sourcing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
AI models' first choice in Recruiting CRM and sourcing, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/recruiting-crm-and-sourcing/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/gem--recruiting-crm-and-sourcing-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Recruiting CRM and sourcing, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Recruiting CRM and sourcing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
AI models' first choice in Recruiting CRM and sourcing, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/recruiting-crm-and-sourcing/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/gem--recruiting-crm-and-sourcing-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Recruiting CRM and sourcing, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Recruiting CRM and sourcing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
AI models' first choice in Recruiting CRM and sourcing, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/recruiting-crm-and-sourcing/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/gem--recruiting-crm-and-sourcing-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Recruiting CRM and sourcing, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Recruiting CRM and sourcing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Talent intelligence

Gem is among the products AI models recommend first in Talent intelligence this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Talent intelligence, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/talent-intelligence/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/gem--talent-intelligence-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Talent intelligence, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Talent intelligence standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Talent intelligence, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/talent-intelligence/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/gem--talent-intelligence-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Talent intelligence, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Talent intelligence standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Talent intelligence, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/talent-intelligence/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/gem--talent-intelligence-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Talent intelligence, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Talent intelligence standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.