Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 83 → 100 of 100
8 categories · RankedBeamery
296Judge labels
16First choices
106Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
8Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Recruiting CRM for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 90 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 48% of its 33 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Beamery →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business104 of 104
0%24 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market18 of 90
2%33 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise4 of 68
4%48 labels
accepted challenger
In talent intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Beamery for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 2% | 18 of 90 | 48% | 33 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 23 of 104 | 33% | 27 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 111 of 111 | 71% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 32 of 102 | 33% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 95 of 127 | 50% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 40 of 90 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 40 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 62 of 114 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Beamery held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Talent intelligence · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 75 → 15 of 80
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 4 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 75 → 18 of 90 |
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 23 of 104 |
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 87 → 111 of 111 |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 32 of 102 |
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 155 → 95 of 127 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 40 of 90 |
| Job advertising | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 40 of 111, unchanged |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Beamery across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Beamery across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 11 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct53 labels5
Paraphrase27 labels7
Comparative83 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained51 labels4
Scale-constrained33 labelsNone
Negative49 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative296 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want to build a database of passive candidates to market to later (like a customer database), choose Beamery.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Phenom and Beamery are described as leading the list for enterprise employer brand and talent-CRM depth.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Beamery is the strongest choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Provides talent operating system with internal marketplace capabilities, known for good value relative to features.” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid high-end, enterprise-only "Recruitment Marketing Platforms" (RMPs) like Phenom, Beamery, or Symphony Talent” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · hard negative
“Primarily talent acquisition tools; more suited for external hiring volume than internal mobility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise tools like Eightfold or Beamery are pricier ($10K+/year) and overkill for budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative
“SeekOut, Findem, Beamery: Don't publish pricing (often signals enterprise-level costs)” Kimi K2 · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Beamery, over the 296 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beamery was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Beamery, over the 296 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beamery was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Beamery. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 293 of the 296 answers that named Beamery and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pin.com145
hrtechsaas.com119
g2.com113
learn.g2.com94
skima.ai90
metaview.ai75
peoplemanagingpeople.com68
guideflow.com67
resources.rework.com66
selectsoftwarereviews.com66
903 of the 903 domain citations in answers naming Beamery came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
beamery.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beamery takes 2% of first choices and Pin takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
beamery.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beamery takes 2% of first choices and Pin takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “talent intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “talent intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“beamery”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 21 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,866 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,789 · 48 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,794
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 90 in talent intelligence
Segment leader
27%
Pin
- First choices
- 16 across its categories
- Named in
- 296 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 293 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on beamery.com
537
subdomains included
Content
290
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 224 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 23 | 0 | 2025-10-06 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 18 | 0 | 2025-12-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2025-10-14 | ||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2023-08-22 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2025-10-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2025-07-30 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Seeing the work not just the workforce notes from our latest hr leaders roundtable blog
- 2026-09-25From jobs to skills insights from our executive breakfast blog
- 2026-09-25Seeing the work not just the workforce notes from our latest hr leaders roundtable blog
- 2026-09-25From jobs to skills insights from our executive breakfast blog
- 2026-02-02Capacity ghosts why the billion dollar ai pivot dies in human silos blog
- 2026-01-27The invisible ledger governing human capital in the age of ai blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page beamery.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Beamery
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Beamery; a claim can dispute any of them.
Beamery / SeekOut 1
Follow Beamery
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Beamery is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Beamery is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered Workforce Transformation Platform
- For
- Enterprises
- Customers named
- SalesforceFlexHiltiWells FargoEisnerAmper
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Beamery's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: beamery.com, trust.beamery.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beamery's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beamery, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Beamery by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Beamery is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Beamery, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.