Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 10 of 91
2 categories · RankedTalentLyft
34Judge labels
6First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Recruitment marketing for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 104 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of TalentLyft →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 99
4%16 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 104
7%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise74 of 78
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TalentLyft for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 7% | 4 of 104 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 61 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TalentLyft held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 3 of 94
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 65 → 68 of 73
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 4% | 6% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 4 of 104 |
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TalentLyft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TalentLyft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels6
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best recruitment marketing platform for a company with a limited budget is TalentLyft, which starts at $40.83 per month” Llama 4 Maverick · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Pick: TalentLyft — Best overall value for marketing-focused features” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“TalentLyft at ~$15/mo and Manatal are the most cited wallet-friendly picks” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Dedicated Recruitment Marketing: TalentLyft” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TalentLyft, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TalentLyft was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TalentLyft, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TalentLyft was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TalentLyft. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 34 answers that named TalentLyft and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
selectsoftwarereviews.com27
g2.com24
learn.g2.com24
sprad.io18
recruiterflow.com16
resources.rework.com16
webtonic.io13
jugglehire.com11
peoplemanagingpeople.com11
worldmetrics.org10
170 of the 170 domain citations in answers naming TalentLyft came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
talentlyft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TalentLyft takes 7% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
talentlyft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TalentLyft takes 7% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “recruitment marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“talentlyft”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 67,376 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,408 · 553 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,127
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 4 of 104 in recruitment marketing
Segment leader
23%
Teamtailor
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on talentlyft.com
3,376
subdomains included
Content
2,261
counted in the table below
Documentation
329
Product · Integration
4 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 1,772 | 0 | 2024-04-01 | ||
| Blog | 433 | undated | |||
| Case study | 26 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 13 | 0 | 2024-12-10 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2024-04-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2024-12-1021883 facebook pixel integration report or ebook
- 2024-04-01Stock broker job description template or tool
- 2024-04-01Stocking job description template or tool
- 2024-04-01Stylist job description template or tool
- 2024-04-01Critical thinking interview questions template or tool
- 2024-04-01Cultural fit interview questions template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page talentlyft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as TalentLyft
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TalentLyft; a claim can dispute any of them.
Talentlyft 2
Follow TalentLyft
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TalentLyft is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TalentLyft is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- online recruiting software with both Recruitment Marketing and Applicant Tracking System solutions
- For
- HR professionals
- Price stated
- Simple and affordable recruitment software talentlyft.com
- Starting price
- 100 talentlyft.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try free for 14 days talentlyft.com
- Integrations claimed
- 3000 talentlyft.com
- Certifications
- GDPREEOC/OFCCP complianceEEOC/OFCCPGDPR and EEOC/OFCCP compliance
- Hosting
- Azure servers
- Customers named
- Gemseek
What TalentLyft's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: talentlyft.com, talentlyft.com/pricing, talentlyft.com/product/applicant-tracking-system, talentlyft.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TalentLyft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TalentLyft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TalentLyft by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TalentLyft is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TalentLyft, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.