Small business▼−9Since September 2026: 17% → 7%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 2 → 6 of 40
5 categories · RankedHirevire
65Judge labels
12First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Video interviewing for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Hirevire →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 42
6%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 66
6%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise27 of 40
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Hirevire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 6% | 4 of 66 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 4% | 4 of 118 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 2% | 9 of 90 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 80 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | |
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 36 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Hirevire held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 26 of 38
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 5% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 4 of 118 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 9 of 90 |
| Video interviewing | 10% | 7% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 4 of 66 |
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 111, unchanged |
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 71, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Hirevire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Hirevire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labels5
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained28 labels7
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For best value under $50/month: Hirevire at $39/month offers the most features for the price with unlimited responses.” Kimi K2 · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · first choice
“Hirevire is currently the top-rated standalone option for mid-sized teams.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budgets, Hirevire at $19/month offers the best value.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Hirevire - Best Overall Value ... Start with Hirevire ($39-49/month)” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hirevire, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hirevire was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hirevire, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hirevire was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hirevire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 65 answers that named Hirevire and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hirevire.comYour site59
hiretruffle.com37
willo.video31
pin.com28
firsthr.app26
selectsoftwarereviews.com24
g2.com19
hackerearth.com16
peoplemanagingpeople.com16
resources.rework.com16
213 of the 272 domain citations in answers naming Hirevire came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hirevire.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hirevire takes 6% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hirevire.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hirevire takes 6% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“hirevire”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 444 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 676 · 4 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 548
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown January 2025, as KLIK Michał Listwoń, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 65 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 65 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hirevire.com
2,920
subdomains included
Content
890
counted in the table below
Documentation
220
Product · Integration
18 · 26
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 659 | 0 | 2026-02-28 | ||
| Blog | 217 | 22 | 2026-09-05 | Applicant tracking syste, AI recruiting assistants | |
| Case study | 4 | 0 | 2026-03-09 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-01-20 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2025-09-30 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-05Where to hire tiktok creators blog
- 2026-09-05Where to hire ugc creators blog
- 2026-09-05Tiktok creator marketplace hire creators blog
- 2026-09-05How to hire tiktok influencers blog
- 2026-09-05Cost to hire tiktok creators blog
- 2026-09-01Ashby mcp blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hirevire.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Hirevire
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Hirevire; a claim can dispute any of them.
HireVire 1
Follow Hirevire
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Hirevire is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Hirevire is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Video screening software
- For
- companies
- Price stated
- Plans are $49, $149 and $249 a month hirevire.com
- Starting price
- 49 hirevire.com
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial, no credit card required hirevire.com
- Integrations claimed
- 7000 hirevire.com
- Certifications
- GDPR CompliantSOC 2 Type 1GDPR
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting, customers
What Hirevire's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hirevire.com, hirevire.com/pricing, trust.hirevire.com, hirevire.com/features/webhooks, hirevire.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hirevire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hirevire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hirevire by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Hirevire is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hirevire, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.