AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › 365Talents · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

365Talents

95Judge labels
10First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Skills intelligence for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 127 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of 365Talents →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 365Talents for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management7%4 of 1270%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Internal talent marketplacePerformance and talent management4%5 of 1020%16accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 17% → 5%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Talent intelligencePerformance and talent management2%12 of 9011%9under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, 365Talents held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 110 → 48 of 139
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 4 of 117
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 7 of 92

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Internal talent marketpl17%5%▼−12Since September 2026: 17% → 5%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 → 5 of 102
Talent intelligence0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 18 → 12 of 90
Skills intelligence6%8%▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 6 → 4 of 127

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated 365Talents across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini23005
Gemini 3.5 Flash12003
Perplexity Sonar12003
Grok 4.1 Fast02103
Mistral Small03003
DeepSeek V4 Flash11215
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K214005
GLM 4.7 FlashX12003
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels3
Paraphrase23 labels3
Comparative20 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels3
Scale-constrained13 labels1
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pure-play AI skills intelligence. Dynamically maps skills from your existing HCM data using AI inference + self-reporting.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · comparative prompt · first choice
“My practical pick: 365Talents if your priority is skills-based talent intelligence and internal mobility” GPT-5.4 mini · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose 365Talents if you want the best *dedicated* skills intelligence platform for a mid-market B2B company.” Perplexity Sonar · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“The recommended internal mobility platform for a mid-sized B2B company is 365Talents.” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal talent marketpl · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“customizing the platform often requires vendor support, making it difficult to use independently and adding hidden costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Talent intelligence · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 365Talents, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 365Talents was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Beamery31 of 952Not among the top eight
Workday Skills Cloud24 of 950Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand20 of 950Not among the top eight
Workday Talent Marketplace13 of 950Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 365Talents. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 95 answers that named 365Talents and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com37
g2.com34
engagedly.com33
peoplemanagingpeople.com33
pin.com32
gartner.com29
skima.ai28
fuel50.com24
hrtechsaas.com24
hr-ai-index.com20

294 of the 294 domain citations in answers naming 365Talents came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

365talents.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, 365Talents takes 7% of first choices and Skills Base takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “skills platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “skills intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90 a month (“365talents”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,859 a month
Searches its site ranks for
689 · 23 in the top three
Sites linking to it
783
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
27 ads · 27 image · 25 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2026, as N.RIch Technologies Oy, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 27 in the year. 26 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 4 of 127 in skills intelligence
Segment leader
18%
Skills Base
First choices
10 across its categories
Named in
95 answers
Its own site cited
in 94 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on 365talents.com
895
subdomains included
Content
233
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
24 · 51
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog158162026-09-25Skills intelligence, Talent intelligence
Webinar or virtual event3542026-07-31Skills intelligence, Internal talent marketpl
Report or ebook2252026-07-01Skills intelligence
Case study1192026-08-03Internal talent marketpl
Glossary or explainer312026-08-27
Template or tool2undated
Podcast or video102025-11-24
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page 365talents.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as 365Talents

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 365Talents; a claim can dispute any of them.
365Talents (by Docebo) 2

Follow 365Talents

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

365Talents is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered Skills Intelligence platform to act on skills, jobs, talent & deliver business efficiency.
For
HR Leaders & Managers; Skills-Based Organizations; Engaged Employees; Enterprise organizations
Price stated
Platform Pricing 365talents.com
Integrations claimed
100 365talents.com
Certifications
ISO42001SOC2SOC 2 Type IIISO 42001
Hosting
EUUS
Customers named
SNCFAlstomVeoliaCrédit AgricoleSociete GeneraleTotalEnergiesEYOrange
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial

What 365Talents's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: 365talents.com, trust.365talents.com, 365talents.com/en/product, 365talents.com/en/customers, 365talents.com/en/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 365Talents's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 365Talents, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 365Talents by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where 365Talents is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name 365Talents, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 365talents.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.