Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 of 73, unchanged
6 categories · RankedAvature
89Judge labels
4First choices
17Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Recruitment marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 75 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market17 of 75
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 75
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Avature for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 2% | 17 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 81 of 104 | 44% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 20 of 102 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 39 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 43 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 55 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Avature held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 18 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 17 of 75, unchanged |
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 81 of 104 |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 44 → 20 of 102 |
| Job advertising | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 111, unchanged |
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 86 → 43 of 111 |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Avature across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Avature across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase21 labels2
Comparative26 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative18 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative89 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd generally recommend Avature if you want a recruiting coordination tool that can grow with you” GPT-5.4 mini · Interview scheduling · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Avature is called best for AI-powered, enterprise-level recruitment marketing in independent buyers guides” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Avature is best for highly configurable enterprise recruiting CRM workflows.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Broader HR suites with integrated internal talent marketplace features.” Mistral Small · Internal talent marketpl · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid: Enterprise Complexity Be cautious of platforms like Beamery, Avature” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · hard negative
“scrutinize it if you need a quick, low-effort rollout or have a small admin team... steep learning curve; G2's reviewer-derived implementation average is seven months” GPT-6 Luna · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“highly customizable but complex... reserved for large budgets and require significant implementation time” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · soft negative
“More enterprise-focused but used by some advanced mid-market companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Avature, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avature was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Avature, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avature was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Avature. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 88 of the 89 answers that named Avature and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
selectsoftwarereviews.com43
g2.com42
hrtechsaas.com38
learn.g2.com31
resources.rework.com30
sprad.io27
joveo.com26
recruiterflow.com23
intervue.io22
peoplemanagingpeople.com20
302 of the 302 domain citations in answers naming Avature came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
avature.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Avature takes 2% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
avature.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Avature takes 2% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “interview scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “interview scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“avature”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 60 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 541,149 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,192 · 1,037 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 11,711
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 17 of 75 in interview scheduling
Segment leader
20%
Calendly
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 89 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 88 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on avature.net
1,283
subdomains included
Content
466
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 159 | 6 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 89 | 10 | 2026-11-16 | ||
| Podcast or video | 85 | 2 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Case study | 52 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 42 | 0 | 2026-03-12 | ||
| Report or ebook | 31 | 3 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2020-10-16 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-11-16Gartner hr symposium xpo apac conference or event
- 2026-10-26Gartner hr symposium xpo us conference or event
- 2026-10-06Gartner hr symposium xpo conference or event
- 2026-09-25High volume hiring process design report or ebook
- 2026-09-15Zukunft conference or event
- 2026-09-11Speed at scale transcoms award winning hiring shift in 23 countries case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page avature.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Avature
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Avature is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Avature is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered Recruitment and Talent Management Platform
- For
- HR leaders and talent acquisition teams
- Integrations claimed
- 24 avature.net/partners
- Certifications
- FedRamp certified
- Customers named
- AmeriLifeWayfairBMC SoftwareVirgin Media O2HenkelBainBMCBankers Life
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Avature's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: avature.net, avature.net/customers, avature.net/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Avature's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Avature, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Avature by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Avature is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Avature, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.