Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 of 80, unchanged
2 categories · RankedHumanly
22Judge labels
2First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in AI recruiting assistants for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 90 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Humanly →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business24 of 90
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 90
4%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise51 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Humanly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 4% | 6 of 90 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 67 of 142 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Humanly held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · AI recruiting assistants · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 → 7 of 84
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 49 of 74, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 6 of 90 |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 78 → 67 of 142 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Humanly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Humanly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels2
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for General & GTM Roles (Sales, Marketing, CS): Humanly ... is an excellent choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Humanly is the most quoted fit for mid-size teams right now.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“A conversational screening platform tailored for mid-market and early-career recruitment.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Humanly if you want a more conversational candidate screening experience” Perplexity Sonar · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“G2 notes its pricing is better suited to mid-market/enterprise and may be too much for low-volume teams” GPT-5.4 mini · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Humanly, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Humanly was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Humanly, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Humanly was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Humanly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Humanly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pin.com10
hiretruffle.com9
lever.co9
greenhouse.com8
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
resources.rework.com7
herohunt.ai6
selectsoftwarereviews.com6
g2.com5
juicebox.ai5
Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Humanly came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
humanly.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Humanly takes 4% of first choices and Manatal takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
humanly.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Humanly takes 4% of first choices and Manatal takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai recruiter”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai recruiter”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“humanly”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,225 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 18,392 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 371 · 26 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,568
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 6 of 90 in AI recruiting assistants
Segment leader
31%
Manatal
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on humanly.io
347
subdomains included
Content
270
counted in the table below
Documentation
42
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 235 | undated | Recruiting CRM, Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | undated | Recruiting CRM | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-01Valet living high volume hiring case study case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page humanly.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Humanly
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Humanly; a claim can dispute any of them.
Humanly.io 1
Follow Humanly
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Humanly is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Humanly is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Recruiting Platform for High-Volume Hiring
- For
- high-volume hiring teams
- Free plan or trial
- Try an AI Interview humanly.io
- Integrations claimed
- 9 humanly.io
- Customers named
- HomeTeam Pest DefenseDomino'sMutual of OmahaCellular SalesReid HealthDK SecurityFleet FeetNEPA Pizza
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, certifications, hosting
What Humanly's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: humanly.io, humanly.io/products/ats, humanly.io/case-studies, humanly.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Humanly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Humanly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Humanly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Humanly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Humanly, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.