Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 71 of 80, unchanged
5 categories · RankedHiredScore
29Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in AI recruiting assistants for enterprise buyers
Rank 75 of 90 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business81 of 90
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market75 of 90
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 76
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HiredScore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 75 of 90 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 43 of 65 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 79 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 61 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 37 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HiredScore held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · AI recruiting assistants · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 26 → 72 of 84
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 13 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 75 of 90 |
| Applicant tracking syste | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 43 of 65, unchanged |
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 79 of 111, unchanged |
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 104, unchanged |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 63 → 37 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HiredScore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HiredScore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose HiredScore if your company is already standardized on Workday” Perplexity Sonar · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“don't require the massive budgets or long implementation timelines of enterprise-scale platforms (like Workday’s newly acquired Paradox or HiredScore)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HiredScore, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HiredScore was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HiredScore, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HiredScore was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HiredScore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 29 answers that named HiredScore and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
greenhouse.com11
dynamicbusiness.com10
pin.com8
metaview.ai7
gem.com6
hiretruffle.com6
lever.co6
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
seekout.com6
darwinbox.com5
Seventy-one of the seventy-one domain citations in answers naming HiredScore came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workday.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, HiredScore takes 0% of first choices and Manatal takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workday.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, HiredScore takes 0% of first choices and Manatal takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai recruiter”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai recruiter”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“hiredscore”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 30 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,213,450 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 69,259 · 7,130 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 28,599
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 75 of 90 in AI recruiting assistants
Segment leader
31%
Manatal
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 29 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 28 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workday.com
11,325
subdomains included
Content
4,000
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
1,116 · 59
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 2,489 | 0 | 2026-02-26 | ||
| Blog | 1,125 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 117 | 3 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 84 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 50 | 0 | 2025-06-18 | ||
| Comparison | 46 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 43 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 18 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 16 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 12 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Create audit readiness checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-31Create audit readiness checklist template or tool
- 2026-07-30Future work podcast helen tupper squiggly careers podcast or video
- 2026-07-29Future work podcast copy paste economy podcast or video
- 2026-07-29Future work podcast copy paste economy podcast or video
- 2026-07-02Lawless ai vs true transformation comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workday.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow HiredScore
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HiredScore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HiredScore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HiredScore by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HiredScore is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HiredScore, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.