| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 5% | 8 of 104 | 18% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−10Since September 2026: 14% → 4%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 2% | 14 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 2% | 13 of 75 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 44 of 65 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 49 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 56 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 14% | 4% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 14% → 4%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 8 of 104 |
| Recruiting CRM | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 14 of 111 |
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 13 of 75 |
| Applicant tracking syste | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 44 of 65 |
| Job advertising | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 49 of 111 |
| Staffing agency tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 56 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Jobvite is a mid-market ATS with sourcing, careers site, candidate experience, and analytics all built in, and is best for mid-market companies with 50-500 annual hires” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruiting CRM · direct prompt · first choice
“For your size, mid-market all-rounders like Jobvite or Workable ... tend to be the strongest fits” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · first choice
“Jobvite and Greenhouse are the top mid-market picks in 2026 comparisons.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“the best single "recruitment marketing platform" is usually Jobvite” GPT-5.4 mini · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Brassring, Jobvite, Personio, Bond Adapt, and Sage as having "a glaring absence of positive feedback"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative
“Jobvite - Multiple user complaints about: - Difficult navigation and unclear interface - Steep learning curve - Limited customization options” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“No specific problems detailed in recent reviews, but... be cautious about its scalability and support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · soft negative
“consistent complaints include: Weak reporting ... Hidden integration costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 48 answers that named Jobvite and are not a share of its labels.
127 of the 127 domain citations in answers naming Jobvite came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 410 | 10 | 2026-09-21 | Applicant tracking syste, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 48 | 11 | 2026-10-08 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2025-08-06 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2024-05-25 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-02-12 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-10-08 |
Every page jobvite.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Jobvite's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jobvite.com, jobvite.com/pricing, jobvite.com/security, jobvite.com/products/crm, jobvite.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jobvite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jobvite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jobvite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: