Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 10 of 80, unchanged
3 categories · Named, not rankedGoPerfect
14Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. GoPerfect was named 5 times in AI recruiting assistants and 2 other categories, where Manatal led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 90
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 90
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise5 of 76
4%4 labels
under the label threshold
In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named GoPerfect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 2% | 12 of 90 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | ▼−17Since September 2026: 19% → 2%, −17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 50 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 58 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, GoPerfect moved past the floor in one of three categories: AI recruiting assistants, −17 points to 2%. It held within the floor in the other two.
Best category · AI recruiting assistants · by segment
Mid-market▼−17Since September 2026: 19% → 2%, −17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 19% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 1 → 10 of 84
Enterprise▼−7Since September 2026: 12% → 5%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | 19% | 2% | ▼−17Since September 2026: 19% → 2%, −17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 → 12 of 90 |
| Talent intelligence | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 58 of 90 |
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 50 of 111 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated GoPerfect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated GoPerfect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“GoPerfect was built for mid-market recruiting teams and is an AI recruiting agent that autonomously sources, screens, and engages candidates.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want a full-pipeline AI agent rather than a classic ATS, GoPerfect is positioned for 50-5,000 employee teams” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative
“If you want a fully agentic, hands-off solution, GoPerfect is worth exploring.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you need sourcing without recruiter involvement, use Noon or GoPerfect” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruiting CRM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GoPerfect, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoPerfect was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GoPerfect, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoPerfect was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GoPerfect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named GoPerfect and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
goperfect.comYour site12
pin.com10
hiretruffle.com7
lever.co6
selectsoftwarereviews.com6
greenhouse.com4
leonar.app4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
skima.ai4
christianandtimbers.com3
Forty-eight of the sixty domain citations in answers naming GoPerfect came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
goperfect.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GoPerfect takes 2% of first choices and Manatal takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
goperfect.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GoPerfect takes 2% of first choices and Manatal takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai recruiter”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai recruiter”
4
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“goperfect”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,666 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,316 · 35 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 715
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 90 in AI recruiting assistants
Segment leader
31%
Manatal
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on goperfect.com
561
subdomains included
Content
454
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 391 | 2 | 2026-09-02 | AI recruiting assistants, Recruiting CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 29 | undated | Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Comparison | 24 | 0 | 2026-04-25 | Talent intelligence | |
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-027 best ai screening tools that rank applicants against the job description in 2026 blog
- 2026-08-03How autonomous ai sourcing agents work and how to choose one in 2026 blog
- 2026-04-25Semantic vs boolean search comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page goperfect.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow GoPerfect
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GoPerfect is its own company.ShowHide
The company
GoPerfect is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI recruiting software
- For
- HR teams and head of talent
- Price stated
- Custom pricing based on your team size and hiring volume. goperfect.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 250 goperfect.com/platform
- Free plan or trial
- 15 minutes. No commitment. No credit card required. goperfect.com/platform
- Integrations claimed
- 60 goperfect.com
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPASOC 2 compliantSOC 2
- Customers named
- ReecoTamar Golan HeadhuntingCoralogixFiverrMcCannOptimoveWorkizKURE
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What GoPerfect's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: goperfect.com, goperfect.com/pricing, goperfect.com/platform, goperfect.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GoPerfect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GoPerfect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GoPerfect by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GoPerfect is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GoPerfect, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.