Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 91
2 categories · RankedTeamtailor
75Judge labels
18First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
23% in Recruitment marketing for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 104 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Teamtailor →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business6 of 99
7%17 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 104
23%30 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise71 of 78
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Teamtailor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 23% | 1 of 104 | 7% | 30 | accepted challenger | ▲+8Since September 2026: 16% → 24%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 20 of 65 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Teamtailor held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment
Mid-market▲+8Since September 2026: 16% → 24%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
24%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 1 of 94, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 50 → 64 of 73
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 16% | 24% | ▲+8Since September 2026: 16% → 24%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 104, unchanged |
| Applicant tracking syste | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 20 of 65 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Teamtailor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Teamtailor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels7
Paraphrase15 labels8
Comparative15 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labels2
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“platforms like Teamtailor and Recruitee are often cited for mid-market teams that want a great career site without an enterprise sales cycle” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · first choice
“Teamtailor (Best Overall for Employer Branding & Ease of Use) ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market employer branding” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Look for modern, agile platforms (such as Gem, Clinch, or Teamtailor) where implementation takes weeks, not quarters.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Teamtailor if your priority is a polished employer brand and a relatively easy no-code setup” Perplexity Sonar · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“flag Teamtailor for "limited customization on Teamtailor, restricting their ability to personalize the career site fully"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited customization options for career sites ... Integration issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Teamtailor, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamtailor was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Teamtailor, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamtailor was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teamtailor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 74 of the 75 answers that named Teamtailor and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com37
resources.rework.com35
hrtechsaas.com30
sprad.io25
selectsoftwarereviews.com24
learn.g2.com21
pin.com17
intervue.io14
joveo.com14
peoplemanagingpeople.com14
231 of the 231 domain citations in answers naming Teamtailor came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Teamtailor stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Teamtailor stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “recruitment marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“teamtailor”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 59 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 42,407 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,128 · 394 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 24,253
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 28 clicks and $230 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
23%
rank 1 of 104 in recruitment marketing
First choices
18
across its categories
- Named in
- 75 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 74 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on teamtailor.com
4,807
subdomains included
Content
420
counted in the table below
Documentation
552
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 134 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | Applicant tracking syste, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Blog | 128 | 0 | 2024-07-01 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Conference or event | 80 | undated | Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 50 | 1 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Case study | 4 | 3 | 2026-09-10 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-10Customer stories case study
- 2026-09-10Grain case study case study
- 2026-09-0210111228 job symbols glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-288159887 checklist before publishing your jobs on external job boards template or tool
- 2026-08-2616646441 webinar recruit with co pilot webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-25423355 add your own facebook pixel code report or ebook
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 8, 2026Partner Experience 2026Strand Rederi, Skeppsbrokajen Kajplats, Stockholm, Sweden · hosted
- May 27, 2026Teamtailor Partner AW StockholmTeamtailor kontor, Östgötagatan 16, våning 6, Stockholm, Sweden · hosted
- May 26, 2026Välkommen på frukost: Psykologisk trygghet i praktikenK6, Kungsgatan 6, Malmö · hosted
- November 5, 2025 to November 6, 2025HR ExpoIFEMA · exhibited
- November 5, 2025Del Proceso al Impacto: Humanizar la Experiencia del Candidato y Elevar el Rol del Talent PartnerSala 7 · spoke
As the event pages on teamtailor.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page teamtailor.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Teamtailor
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Teamtailor is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Teamtailor is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Next Generation ATS & Employer Branding
- For
- companies
- Price stated
- Kontakt os, så vender vi tilbage til dig med et prisoverslag for vores komplette rekrutteringssoftware. teamtailor.com/da/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 450 teamtailor.com
- Certifications
- GDPRISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27701SOC 2
- Customers named
- Greencarrier GroupFenix OutdoorKlass WagenGiacomWhyte & MackayJohn Fluevog ShoesHome MadeSATS
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Teamtailor's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: teamtailor.com, teamtailor.com/da/pricing, trust.teamtailor.com, teamtailor.com/da/customers, teamtailor.com/en/productnews/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teamtailor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teamtailor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teamtailor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Teamtailor is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Teamtailor, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Teamtailor is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Teamtailor is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Teamtailor first in Recruitment marketing and career sites this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.