AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Beamery › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Beamery, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 421 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where Beamery holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 421 answers that did not name Beamery, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Talent intelligence

Performance and talent management. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Beamery is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessBeamery is #16 of 16 here at 0% of first choices, 24 labels.

Eighty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Beamery; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-three answers, twenty-two products in all, the eight most named:

Pin15 of 83
Loxo10 of 83
Metaview6 of 83
Gem4 of 83
Manatal3 of 83
SeekOut3 of 83
Workable3 of 83
hireEZ3 of 83
14 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketBeamery is #10 of 13 here at 2% of first choices, 33 labels.

Seventy-two of the eighty-four answers did not name Beamery; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

Pin13 of 72
Gem7 of 72
hireEZ5 of 72
Manatal3 of 72
Fuel502 of 72
Metaview2 of 72
Phenom2 of 72
9 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseBeamery is #4 of 15 here at 4% of first choices, 48 labels.

Fifty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name Beamery; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those fifty-one answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:

Eightfold AI17 of 51
Gloat2 of 51
SeekOut2 of 51
365Talents1 of 51
Bryq1 of 51
Findem1 of 51
Phenom1 of 51
4 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Recruitment marketing and career sites

Talent acquisition. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Beamery is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessBeamery is #13 of 14 here at 0% of first choices, 13 labels.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Beamery; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twenty products in all, the eight most named:

JazzHR15 of 84
Manatal10 of 84
Workable10 of 84
Breezy HR7 of 84
Teamtailor7 of 84
TalentLyft5 of 84
100Hires4 of 84
12 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketBeamery is #16 of 17 here at 0% of first choices, 27 labels.

Seventy-five of the eighty-four answers did not name Beamery; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those seventy-five answers, twenty-one products in all, the eight most named:

Teamtailor12 of 75
Breezy HR4 of 75
Gem4 of 75
Phenom4 of 75
TalentLyft4 of 75
Jobvite3 of 75
13 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseBeamery is #2 of 13 here at 12% of first choices, 42 labels.

Fifty-six of the eighty-four answers did not name Beamery; it was the first choice in ten. The first choices in those fifty-six answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

Phenom15 of 56
Greenhouse4 of 56
MokaHR3 of 56
Avature2 of 56
Bullhorn2 of 56
Appcast1 of 56
6 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Beamery neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Beamery only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Beamery's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Beamery was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.