Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 86 → 88 of 91
1 category · RankedSymphony Talent
57Judge labels
4First choices
19Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Recruitment marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 13 of 104 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Symphony Talent →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business96 of 99
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market13 of 104
3%17 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise10 of 78
3%27 labels
accepted challenger
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Symphony Talent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 3% | 13 of 104 | 29% | 17 | criticized challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Symphony Talent held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 38 → 12 of 94
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 9 of 73
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 13 of 104 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Symphony Talent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Symphony Talent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative19 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels2
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Joveo or Symphony if your biggest pain point is paying too much for job ads and wasting money on roles that are already filled.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
“1. Phenom or Symphony Talent - These are among the top-ranked branded careers site builders for 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Prioritize platforms unifying branding, CRM, and ads (e.g., SmashFly or RecruitBPM excel here).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · first choice
“a pioneer in combining recruitment marketing with programmatic job advertising and brand agency services” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid high-end, enterprise-only "Recruitment Marketing Platforms" (RMPs) like Phenom, Beamery, or Symphony Talent” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · hard negative
“do extra reference checks rather than relying on its aggregate rating: the G2 listing shows 3.7/5 from 23 reviews, a relatively small sample” GPT-6 Luna · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise platforms (like Beamery, Phenom, or Symphony Talent) are powerful, but they often require dedicated administrators” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · soft negative
“Why to be cautious: ... users frequently report a steep learning curve and a UI that is not user-friendly.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Symphony Talent, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Symphony Talent was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Symphony Talent, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Symphony Talent was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Symphony Talent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 57 answers that named Symphony Talent and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hrtechsaas.com34
selectsoftwarereviews.com28
g2.com27
sprad.io27
joveo.com24
learn.g2.com22
resources.rework.com22
recruiterflow.com19
intervue.io18
mokahr.io18
239 of the 239 domain citations in answers naming Symphony Talent came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
symphonytalent.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Symphony Talent takes 3% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
symphonytalent.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Symphony Talent takes 3% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “recruitment marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“symphony talent”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 17 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,182 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 476 · 13 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,001
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 13 of 104 in recruitment marketing
Segment leader
23%
Teamtailor
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 57 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 56 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on symphonytalent.com
692
subdomains included
Content
574
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
19 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 418 | 11 | 2026-09-18 | Applicant tracking syste, Interview scheduling | |
| Report or ebook | 51 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 50 | 0 | 2026-03-30 | ||
| Podcast or video | 18 | undated | |||
| Case study | 12 | 0 | 2026-04-10 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 4 | 0 | 2016-08-01 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Refresh data driven guide report or ebook
- 2026-09-18How to turn recruiting data decision blog
- 2026-09-17Harver acquires symphony talent blog
- 2026-08-25Ranked isnt recommended an ai search visibility audit blog
- 2026-08-24Evps built to be seen by ai search blog
- 2026-08-18Ai employer brand audit report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page symphonytalent.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Symphony Talent
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Symphony Talent; a claim can dispute any of them.
SmashFly 1SmashFly (Symphony Talent) 1Smashfly 1Symphony Talent (SFX CRM) 1Symphony Talent (SmashFlyX) 1Symphony Talent (formerly SmashFly) 1
Follow Symphony Talent
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Symphony Talent is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Symphony Talent is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Full-funnel TA technology meets bold brand storytelling
- For
- talent acquisition teams
- Customers named
- SanofiMolson Coorsbp
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Symphony Talent's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: symphonytalent.com, symphonytalent.com/solutions, symphonytalent.com/about-us/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Symphony Talent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Symphony Talent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Symphony Talent by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Symphony Talent is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Symphony Talent, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.