| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 15% | 2 of 111 | 15% | 34 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 15% → 17%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 22 of 104 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising | 15% | 17% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 15% → 17%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 2 of 111 |
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 22 of 104 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Appcast if: You are primarily hiring in North America... You want the industry standard with proven reliability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, [Appcast](https://www.appcast.com) is the strongest overall choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · direct prompt · first choice
“Some options to consider include Appcast, which has a minimum campaign spend of $200-$300” Llama 4 Maverick · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice
“For the absolute lowest cost entry point, Adway and Appcast are your best bets.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid these on a tight budget: These platforms charge monthly software fees ranging from $500 to $2,000+ per month.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · budget prompt · hard negative
“While enterprise heavyweights like *Appcast* and *Joveo* are industry giants... ask specifically for their managed services ... so you aren't overwhelmed by enterprise-level complexity.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · scale prompt · soft negative
“they may not be suitable if your roles receive a short number of applications... may not be cost-effective for all types of positions” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“buying a massive, standalone enterprise distribution tool (like Broadbean or Appcast) is often overkill and highly inefficient” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 150 of the 154 answers that named Appcast and are not a share of its labels.
574 of the 574 domain citations in answers naming Appcast came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 324 | 6 | 2026-09-24 | Applicant tracking syste, Workforce planning | |
| Case study | 24 | 0 | 2026-05-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 22 | 0 | 2024-10-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-02-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-28 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page appcast.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Appcast's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: appcast.io, appcast.io/products/brand-ads, appcast.io/customer-stories, appcast.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Appcast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Appcast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Appcast by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Appcast is among the products AI models recommend first in Job advertising and distribution this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.