AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › edX › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to edX, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 479 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where edX holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 479 answers that did not name edX, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Online course libraries

Learning and development. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when edX is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessedX holds 3 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name edX; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-three answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:

GoSkills12 of 83
TalentLMS7 of 83
Teachable2 of 83
Thinkific2 of 83
10 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketedX is #6 of 8 here at 0% of first choices, 14 labels.

Seventy-four of the eighty-four answers did not name edX; it was the first choice in four. The first choices in those seventy-four answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:

TalentLMS3 of 74
Go12 of 74
GoSkills1 of 74
Litmos1 of 74
3 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseedX is #7 of 10 here at 2% of first choices, 14 labels.

Seventy-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name edX; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-seven answers, sixteen products in all, the eight most named:

8 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Skills intelligence

Performance and talent management. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when edX is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessedX holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name edX; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twenty-seven products in all, the eight most named:

Skills Base30 of 84
GoSkills7 of 84
SkillPanel6 of 84
MuchSkills4 of 84
TalentLMS4 of 84
iMocha4 of 84
ESCO3 of 84
19 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketedX is #14 of 16 here at 0% of first choices, 14 labels.

Seventy-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name edX; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-seven answers, twenty-six products in all, the eight most named:

Skills Base10 of 77
365Talents5 of 77
Gloat5 of 77
iMocha5 of 77
TechWolf4 of 77
18 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseedX holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name edX; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twenty-three products in all, the eight most named:

15 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled edX neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named edX only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from edX's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of edX was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.