Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 129 → 133 of 139
1 category · RankedTechWolf
38Judge labels
9First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Skills intelligence for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 127 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of TechWolf →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business135 of 144
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 127
7%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 99
10%23 labels
accepted challenger
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TechWolf for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 7% | 5 of 127 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 9% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TechWolf held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 9% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 5 of 117, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 12% → 11%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | 9% | 8% | =heldSince September 2026: 9% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 of 127, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TechWolf across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TechWolf across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels2
Paraphrase15 labels5
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“TalentGuard or TechWolf offer the best balance of functionality, ease of use, and cost.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“TechWolf or 365Talents: Highly regarded for "skills inference"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Skills intelligence · scale prompt · first choice
“## Recommended Inference Tool: TechWolf” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“TechWolf is the gold standard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TechWolf, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TechWolf was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TechWolf, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TechWolf was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TechWolf. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named TechWolf and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
techwolf.aiYour site20
peoplemanagingpeople.com16
hrtechsaas.com15
firsthr.app14
darwinbox.com12
hr-ai-index.com12
acorn.works11
fuel50.com11
inop.ai10
skywork.ai10
111 of the 131 domain citations in answers naming TechWolf came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
techwolf.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TechWolf takes 7% of first choices and Skills Base takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
techwolf.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TechWolf takes 7% of first choices and Skills Base takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “skills platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “skills intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“techwolf”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 476 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 110 · 12 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 533
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 5 of 127 in skills intelligence
Segment leader
18%
Skills Base
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 38 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 38 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on techwolf.ai
753
subdomains included
Content
236
counted in the table below
Documentation
389
Product · Integration
17 · 17
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 92 | 70 | 2026-09-28 | Workforce planning, Skills intelligence | |
| Podcast or video | 34 | undated | Skills intelligence, Workforce planning | ||
| Conference or event | 33 | 4 | 2026-10-06 | People analytics | |
| Report or ebook | 29 | undated | |||
| Case study | 17 | undated | |||
| News or press | 12 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | Skills intelligence | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | Skills intelligence, Talent intelligence | |
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 3 | 2026-09-18 | Skills intelligence, Talent intelligence | |
| Comparison | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | Skills intelligence, Talent intelligence |
Most recent
- 2026-10-06Gartner hr symposium xpo tm 2026 conference conference or event
- 2026-10-05Sap connect conference or event
- 2026-10-05Sap connect las vegas conference or event
- 2026-09-28When code gets cheap judgment gets expensive blog
- 2026-09-24Platform series rebuilding observability blog
- 2026-09-24Weeks not months how chiesi rebuilt the foundation for its workforce transformation blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 6, 2026 to October 8, 2026Gartner HR Symposium/Xpo™ 2026 conferenceLondon, UK · exhibited
- May 4, 2026AI Day 2026 change your track to Main Stage OnlyGhent, Belgium · hosted
- May 4, 2026AI Day 2026 change your trackGhent, Belgium · hosted
- December 9, 2025From buzzwords to business value: What it really takes to build a skills-based organizationTechWolf NYC Office · hosted
- November 18, 2025 to November 19, 2025The AI Leadership SummitBrooklyn · attended
As the event pages on techwolf.ai state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page techwolf.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as TechWolf
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TechWolf; a claim can dispute any of them.
Techwolf 1
Follow TechWolf
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TechWolf is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TechWolf is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The intelligence to act with confidence
- For
- large enterprises
- Price stated
- null techwolf.ai/customer-stories
- Starting price
- null techwolf.ai/customer-stories
- Free plan or trial
- Try it out techwolf.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 4 techwolf.ai · 20 techwolf.ai/product/overview pages disagree
- Certifications
- Kiwa ISO certificateCertificate K-0222530-1 c TechWolf B.V.SOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001ISO 42001ISO/IEC 42001:2023ISO
- Hosting
- United StatesEuropean Union
- Customers named
- HSBCAtlas Copco GroupEricssonWorkdaySynopsysChiesiServiceNowRed Hat
What TechWolf's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: techwolf.ai, trust.techwolf.ai, techwolf.ai/product/overview, techwolf.ai/customer-stories, techwolf.ai/product/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TechWolf's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TechWolf, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TechWolf by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TechWolf is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TechWolf, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.