AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › SC Training · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

SC Training

57Judge labels
12First choices
1Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Compliance training for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 92 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SC Training →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SC Training for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Compliance trainingLearning and development8%7 of 920%14accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Online course librariesLearning and development2%11 of 9533%3under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Learning experience platformsLearning and development0%14 of 890%5under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, SC Training held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Compliance training · by segment

Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 of 61, unchanged
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 of 89, unchanged
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Compliance training5%9%▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 7 of 92, unchanged
Learning experience plat2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 14 of 89
Online course libraries2%3%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 11 of 95

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated SC Training across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02013
Perplexity Sonar02002
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash21104
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained28 labels11
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“likely to be a lightweight platform such as SC Training or Coassemble, which offer straightforward programs and are budget-friendly” Llama 4 Maverick · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have absolutely zero budget, SC Training (EdApp) is widely considered the best all-in-one solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Online course libraries · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small companies with a tight budget, I'd recommend starting with SC Training (EdApp).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“EasyLlama and SC Training are excellent choices for very small teams” Mistral Small · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“was retired by SafetyCulture on March 31, 2026, meaning it is no longer an option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Online course libraries · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SC Training, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SC Training was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
360Learning29 of 556Not among the top eight
GoSkills25 of 5514Not among the top eight
Docebo14 of 551Not among the top eight
iSpring Learn14 of 551Not among the top eight
Degreed13 of 550Not among the top eight
Udemy Business11 of 551Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand11 of 550Not among the top eight
Coassemble10 of 550Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SC Training. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 55 answers that named SC Training and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app34
goskills.com29
thinkific.com21
ispring.com19
continu.com15
g2.com15
intelligentliving.co14
group.app13
knowlify.com13
proprofstraining.com13

186 of the 186 domain citations in answers naming SC Training came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

safetyculture.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SC Training takes 8% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “compliance training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance training providers”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“sc training”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
825 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 466,981 a month
Searches its site ranks for
71,982 · 3,168 in the top three
Sites linking to it
20,421
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
103 ads · 63 text, 29 image, 11 video · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2023, as SafetyCulture Pty Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 54 in the year, 49 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
8%
rank 7 of 92 in compliance training
Segment leader
22%
Traliant
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
55 answers
Its own site cited
in 53 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on safetyculture.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
1,403
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
1 · 610
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool1,04422026-09-25360 feedback, Employee onboarding
Blog131112026-09-27
Case study104112026-09-24
Comparison55undated
Webinar or virtual event3832026-10-22
Report or ebook1702026-02-09
Conference or event1002020-08-03
Glossary or explainer2undated
Podcast or video102018-12-14
News or press1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page safetyculture.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as SC Training

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SC Training; a claim can dispute any of them.
SC Training (formerly EdApp) 11EdApp 5GoSkills / SC Training 1SC Training (EdApp) 1SC Training (SafetyCulture) 1

Follow SC Training

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SC Training's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SC Training, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SC Training by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SC Training is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SC Training, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at safetyculture.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.