| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 8% | 7 of 92 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 2% | 11 of 95 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 14 of 89 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance training | 5% | 9% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 92, unchanged |
| Learning experience plat | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 14 of 89 |
| Online course libraries | 2% | 3% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 11 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“likely to be a lightweight platform such as SC Training or Coassemble, which offer straightforward programs and are budget-friendly” Llama 4 Maverick · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have absolutely zero budget, SC Training (EdApp) is widely considered the best all-in-one solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Online course libraries · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small companies with a tight budget, I'd recommend starting with SC Training (EdApp).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“EasyLlama and SC Training are excellent choices for very small teams” Mistral Small · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“was retired by SafetyCulture on March 31, 2026, meaning it is no longer an option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Online course libraries · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 55 answers that named SC Training and are not a share of its labels.
186 of the 186 domain citations in answers naming SC Training came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 1,044 | 2 | 2026-09-25 | 360 feedback, Employee onboarding | |
| Blog | 131 | 11 | 2026-09-27 | ||
| Case study | 104 | 11 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 55 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 38 | 3 | 2026-10-22 | ||
| Report or ebook | 17 | 0 | 2026-02-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 0 | 2020-08-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2018-12-14 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page safetyculture.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SC Training's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SC Training, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SC Training by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: