Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 → 8 of 104
5 categories · RankedLearnWorlds
83Judge labels
10First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Learning experience plat for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 82 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 112
4%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 82
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise26 of 96
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LearnWorlds for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 4% | 5 of 82 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 34 of 89 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 44 of 61 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 47 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 0% | 38 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LearnWorlds held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Course authoring tools · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 5 of 76
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 35 → 24 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 5 of 82 |
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 44 → 34 of 89 |
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 44 of 61 |
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 73 → 47 of 128 |
| Online course libraries | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 95, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LearnWorlds across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LearnWorlds across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labelsNone
Paraphrase34 labels9
Comparative10 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative83 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LearnWorlds and Thinkific Plus are the top choices due to their scalability, ease of use, and robust feature sets.” Mistral Small · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. LearnWorlds - Best for: All-in-one coaching and course delivery” Mistral Small · Coaching platforms · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd particularly recommend Thinkific or LearnWorlds” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If your focus is on selling training to other businesses, LearnWorlds or Thinkific Plus may be the best fit.” Mistral Small · Learning experience plat · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Proprietary formats (e.g., Thinkific/Learnworlds critiques) | Can't export content easily” Grok 4.1 Fast · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative
“Has a $5 per-enrollment fee which can add up” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning management syst · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LearnWorlds, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LearnWorlds was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LearnWorlds, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LearnWorlds was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LearnWorlds. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 83 of the 83 answers that named LearnWorlds and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learnworlds.comYour site64
goskills.com41
talentlms.com35
proprofstraining.com30
capterra.com29
forbes.com26
g2.com25
ispring.com25
peoplemanagingpeople.com25
d2l.com16
252 of the 316 domain citations in answers naming LearnWorlds came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
learnworlds.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LearnWorlds takes 4% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
learnworlds.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LearnWorlds takes 4% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “authoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “elearning authoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“learnworlds”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 67 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 27,442 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,629 · 223 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 16,528
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $51 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 5 of 82 in course authoring tools
Segment leader
30%
Articulate 360
- First choices
- 10 across its categories
- Named in
- 83 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 83 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on learnworlds.com
953
subdomains included
Content
686
counted in the table below
Documentation
27
Product · Integration
104 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 438 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 88 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 49 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 41 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 27 | undated | |||
| Case study | 24 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page learnworlds.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as LearnWorlds
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LearnWorlds; a claim can dispute any of them.
Learnworlds 2
Follow LearnWorlds
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LearnWorlds is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LearnWorlds is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The complete LMS software to build, deliver, and scale training programs.
- For
- learning businesses; course creators; training providers; NGOs & education networks
- Price stated
- Starter 29 USD; Pro Trainer 79 USD; Learning Center 299 USD learnworlds.com
- Starting price
- 29 learnworlds.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start free learnworlds.com
- Integrations claimed
- 50 learnworlds.com · 4000 learnworlds.com/product/integrations pages disagree
- Certifications
- GDPR-compliant
- Customers named
- ImprovPianoTipsCalisthenicsLearning LiaisonsDrone itnailArtsHacking HRPennylaneKonsultori
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What LearnWorlds's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: learnworlds.com, learnworlds.com/plans, learnworlds.com/product/updates, learnworlds.com/customers, learnworlds.com/product/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LearnWorlds's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LearnWorlds, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LearnWorlds by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LearnWorlds is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LearnWorlds, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.