AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Litmos · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Litmos

45Judge labels
1First choices
7Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Online course libraries for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 95 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In online course libraries · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Litmos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Online course librariesLearning and development2%7 of 950%4under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Learning experience platformsLearning and development0%27 of 8922%9under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Litmos held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Online course libraries · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 36 → 21 of 68
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 8 → 7 of 90
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 → 18 of 66

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Learning experience plat2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 9 → 27 of 89
Online course libraries2%3%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 → 7 of 95

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Litmos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small00303
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501012
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Litmos if you want the best balance of ready-made course content, fast deployment, and compliance-focused training” Perplexity Sonar · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider Litmos if you prioritize: Compliance training automation” MiniMax M2.5 · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Litmos ⭐ Best for Compliance-Focused Organizations” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“flagged for "legacy" feel and weak reporting capabilities compared to peers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative
“might be more complex than needed for a mid-sized company” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Litmos, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Litmos was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Docebo31 of 444Not among the top eight
Udemy Business18 of 447Not among the top eight
360Learning18 of 444Not among the top eight
Absorb LMS14 of 441Not among the top eight
LinkedIn Learning13 of 443Not among the top eight
Coursera for Business13 of 441Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand12 of 440Not among the top eight
TalentLMS12 of 440Not among the top eight
GoSkills11 of 444Not among the top eight
Skillsoft Percipio9 of 440Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Litmos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 44 answers that named Litmos and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

litmos.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Litmos takes 2% of first choices and Udemy Business takes 48%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “course libraries”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “online course library for employees”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
8,100 a month (“litmos”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
143 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 7,774 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,129 · 96 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,111
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
50 ads · 49 text, 1 image · 32 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Litmos US, L.P., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 30 in the year, 20 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 95 in online course libraries
Segment leader
48%
Udemy Business
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
44 answers
Its own site cited
in 42 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on litmos.com
1,507
subdomains included
Content
895
counted in the table below
Documentation
364
Product · Integration
35 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog753142026-09-21
Webinar or virtual event6802026-05-07
Case study4212026-07-21
Template or tool1402026-05-07
Report or ebook502024-06-04
Comparison532026-09-11
Glossary or explainer512026-09-02
Conference or event212026-07-24
News or press102026-04-28

Events in person

Upcoming

As the event pages on litmos.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page litmos.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Litmos

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Litmos; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP Litmos 4Litmos (SAP) 1Sap Litmos 1

Follow Litmos

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Litmos is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Learning Acceleration Platform That Builds Capability at the Speed of AI
For
organizations across the workforce, partners, and customers; L&D teams
Customers named
Student RoostUSA VolleyballPCSIAir GeneralThe Trevor ProjectGlobal Real Estate SchoolNAVBLUEStockport Homes
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Litmos's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: litmos.com, litmos.com/plans, trust.litmos.com, litmos.com/platform, litmos.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Litmos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Litmos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Litmos by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Litmos is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Litmos, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at litmos.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.