Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 139
1 category · RankedMuchSkills
38Judge labels
6First choices
1Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Skills intelligence for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 127 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of MuchSkills →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 144
2%21 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 127
5%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise73 of 99
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MuchSkills for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 5% | 6 of 127 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MuchSkills held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 6 of 117
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 31 → 69 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 6 of 127 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MuchSkills across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MuchSkills across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase7 labels2
Comparative6 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels2
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MuchSkills: Excellent for professional services, engineering, or project-heavy companies needing beautiful, easy-to-read skill matrices and CV builders.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Skills intelligence · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with a free trial from Pin or MuchSkills to evaluate which features best match your organization's needs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
“Skills Base or MuchSkills are particularly recommended” Mistral Small · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · first choice
“Free tier for lightweight visual skills mapping and gap analysis; good starter but less feature-rich.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MuchSkills, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MuchSkills was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MuchSkills, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MuchSkills was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MuchSkills. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named MuchSkills and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app23
muchskills.comYour site18
skills-base.com14
fuel50.com12
g2.com12
itechguides.com12
agyleos.com11
skillpanel.com11
cloudassess.com10
cxeverywhere.com10
115 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming MuchSkills came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
muchskills.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MuchSkills takes 5% of first choices and Skills Base takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
muchskills.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MuchSkills takes 5% of first choices and Skills Base takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “skills platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “skills intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“muchskills”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 51,766 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,949 · 178 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,025
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
5%
rank 6 of 127 in skills intelligence
Segment leader
18%
Skills Base
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 38 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 38 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on muchskills.com
449
subdomains included
Content
150
counted in the table below
Documentation
48
Product · Integration
35 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 99 | 18 | 2026-09-02 | Workforce planning, Skills intelligence | |
| News or press | 22 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | Skills intelligence, Performance management | |
| Report or ebook | 18 | 0 | 2026-03-15 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 1 | 2026-08-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 2 | 2026-09-12 | Workforce planning, Skills intelligence | |
| Case study | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-12What is a skills matrix and why do you need a modern one glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-09Unleash world 2026 news or press
- 2026-09-02Skills management what is it and why do you need it blog
- 2026-09-02Employee training record template blog
- 2026-08-28Sap skills management participation layer blog
- 2026-08-22Build vs buy why cultivating internal talent beats costly external hiring comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page muchskills.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name workforce planning (10); 6 name the category the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow MuchSkills
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MuchSkills is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MuchSkills is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered Skills Intelligence Platform
- For
- Built for HR and L&D, workforce planning, resourcing, engineering and compliance teams.
- Price stated
- Plans scale from Starter to Enterprise. The pricing page compares the plans; prices are on request. muchskills.com
- Free plan or trial
- Yes, with a proof of concept: a scoped pilot on your own data and your own questions, so you see the answers you would get, not a demo account. muchskills.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPRISO 9001ISO 27001AS9100CSRD/ESRS S1G-Cloud 14GDPR compliant
- Hosting
- European UnionEU
- Customers named
- TBSNigeria's Federal Civil ServicePhillips ConsultingNigeria’s Federal Civil Service
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations
What MuchSkills's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: muchskills.com, muchskills.com/pricing, trust.muchskills.com, muchskills.com/features/org-chart, muchskills.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MuchSkills's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MuchSkills, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MuchSkills by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MuchSkills is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MuchSkills, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.