| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 0% | 12 of 95 | 7% | 54 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 83 of 89 | 57% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online course libraries | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 12 of 95 |
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 75 → 83 of 89 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Coursera or edX if you need a recognizable brand name on your resume or are looking for a highly structured, deep academic program.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · first choice
“Coursera’s FY2025 annual report lists 13,500+ courses ... Coursera’s scale advantage over edX has widened further.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want a university-backed course, look at Coursera or edX and opt for the "audit" (free) version first” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Online course libraries · negative prompt · first choice
“Coursera is the best overall online learning platform in 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“here are learning experience platforms you should avoid or be cautious about... ### Coursera - Fraudulent billing practices” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · hard negative
“Extremely low completion rates (e.g., 4–16% per UPenn/Vice studies), uneven content quality” Grok 4.1 Fast · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution Point: Cost vs. Value. A major complaint is the "subscription trap."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative
“Coursera, edX (when paying full price). Verdict: Be Cautious of Costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Online course libraries · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 152 of the 166 answers that named Coursera for Business and are not a share of its labels.
437 of the 437 domain citations in answers naming Coursera for Business came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Coursera for Business's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: coursera.org, coursera.org/learn/security, coursera.org/specializations/platform-thinking, coursera.org/business/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coursera for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coursera for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Coursera for Business by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: