AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Skillshare › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Skillshare, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 495 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where Skillshare holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 495 answers that did not name Skillshare, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Online course libraries

Learning and development. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Skillshare is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessSkillshare holds 4 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Skillshare; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-three answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

GoSkills12 of 83
TalentLMS7 of 83
Teachable2 of 83
Thinkific2 of 83
9 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketSkillshare is #7 of 8 here at 0% of first choices, 17 labels.

Seventy-eight of the eighty-four answers did not name Skillshare; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-eight answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

6 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseSkillshare holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Skillshare; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

9 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Skills intelligence

Performance and talent management. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Skillshare is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessSkillshare holds 1 label here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Skillshare; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twenty-seven products in all, the eight most named:

Skills Base30 of 84
GoSkills7 of 84
SkillPanel6 of 84
MuchSkills4 of 84
TalentLMS4 of 84
iMocha4 of 84
ESCO3 of 84
19 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketSkillshare is #16 of 16 here at 0% of first choices, 14 labels.

Eighty-two of the eighty-four answers did not name Skillshare; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-two answers, twenty-seven products in all, the eight most named:

Skills Base10 of 82
iMocha6 of 82
365Talents5 of 82
Gloat5 of 82
TechWolf4 of 82
Degreed3 of 82
19 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseSkillshare holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Skillshare; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twenty-three products in all, the eight most named:

15 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Skillshare neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Skillshare only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Skillshare's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Skillshare was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.