Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 5 of 40
1 category · RankedmyInterview
41Judge labels
6First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Video interviewing for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of myInterview →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 42
8%22 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 66
4%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise15 of 40
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named myInterview for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 4% | 6 of 66 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 10% → 5%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, myInterview held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 10% → 5%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 63
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 of 38, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 10% | 5% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 10% → 5%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 6 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated myInterview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated myInterview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels6
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best video interviewing platform for a company with a limited budget is myInterview, as it offers a genuine free tier” Llama 4 Maverick · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“myInterview is likely your best choice” Mistral Small · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Best to try for free: myInterview because it offers a genuine free tier” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
“If you need truly zero cost to start: EasyHire free plan or myInterview free.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as myInterview, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and myInterview was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as myInterview, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and myInterview was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named myInterview. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 41 answers that named myInterview and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hiretruffle.com28
selectsoftwarereviews.com24
willo.video24
hirevire.com21
resources.rework.com19
firsthr.app18
pin.com17
jazzhr.com15
sparkhire.com15
learn.g2.com14
195 of the 195 domain citations in answers naming myInterview came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
radancy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, myInterview takes 4% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
radancy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, myInterview takes 4% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“myinterview”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,692 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 591 · 88 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,626
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 6 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 41 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 41 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on radancy.com
1,123
subdomains included
Content
830
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
23 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 735 | 10 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 33 | 7 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 8 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| News or press | 14 | 5 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 0 | 2025-07-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2023-08-01 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24The buyers guide to intelligent career site technology 2 report or ebook
- 2026-09-23Beyond ai adoption building ai maturity for workday customers blog
- 2026-09-23Connecting workday and programmatic advertising for smarter hiring blog
- 2026-09-23Why candidate drop off starts before candidates ever reach workday blog
- 2026-09-18Press coverage news or press
- 2026-09-18Radancy stellt agentic ai fur die talent acquisition vor news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page radancy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as myInterview
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as myInterview; a claim can dispute any of them.
MyInterview 1
Follow myInterview
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when myInterview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as myInterview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for myInterview by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where myInterview is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name myInterview, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.