| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 23 of 66 | 38% | 13 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 96 of 106 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Whistleblowing and investigations | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 103 of 107 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FaceUp at 25% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 23 of 66 |
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 96 of 106, unchanged |
| Whistleblowing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 103 of 107, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Platforms more widely trusted by users include Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams (for live interviews)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · alternative
“If you are extremely lean (<10 hires/year): Use Zoom/Google Meet” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
“Zoom or Google Meet — completely free for live video interviews” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
“Zoom's free tier has a 40-minute limit on group calls” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“such as WhatsApp, Instagram DM, Facebook Messenger, Skype, Zoom... invasive or unsuitable” Perplexity Sonar · Whistleblowing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Unmanaged Meeting Apps - Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams (personal accounts)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · negative prompt · hard negative
“Standard meeting tools used as a full interviewing system such as Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, or Skype, if the company relies on them without consistent process... these tools lack recruitment-specific features” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Privacy and security concerns when using video services like Zoom have been widely reported ... should cause employers to exercise caution” Muse Glimmer 30B · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 40 answers that named Zoom and are not a share of its labels.
148 of the 148 domain citations in answers naming Zoom came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 311 | undated | |||
| Blog | 214 | 17 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 63 | 2 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Comparison | 40 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 15 | 0 | 2025-11-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated |
Every page zoom.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Zoom's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoom.com, trust.zoom.com, zoom.com/de/products/cmk, zoom.com/ja/customer-stories, zoom.com/de/products/voip-phone/features/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoom's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoom, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoom by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: