Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 40
1 category · RankedEasyHire.me
23Judge labels
7First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Video interviewing for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 42
10%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 66
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named EasyHire.me for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 4% | 7 of 66 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, EasyHire.me held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 10 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 7% | 2% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 7 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated EasyHire.me across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated EasyHire.me across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels5
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most limited-budget companies doing async screening only, EasyHire or Hireflix gives the best cost-to-capability balance.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“1. EasyHire ⭐ Best Overall for Budget” MiniMax M2.5 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for AI Features ... Combines AI-generated interview questions with video screening” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
“EasyHire: Offers a basic free tier” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as EasyHire.me, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EasyHire.me was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as EasyHire.me, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EasyHire.me was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EasyHire.me. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named EasyHire.me and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hiretruffle.com16
selectsoftwarereviews.com16
willo.video16
easyhire.meYour site13
firsthr.app12
pin.com11
learn.g2.com10
linkedin.com10
resources.rework.com10
screenapp.io10
111 of the 124 domain citations in answers naming EasyHire.me came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
easyhire.me is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, EasyHire.me takes 4% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
easyhire.me is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, EasyHire.me takes 4% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“easyhire.me”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 142 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 64 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 262
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on easyhire.me
39
subdomains included
Content
14
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 11 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | AI recruiting assistants | |
| Comparison | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Hiring trust problem blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page easyhire.me exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as EasyHire.me
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EasyHire.me; a claim can dispute any of them.
EasyHire 5
Follow EasyHire.me
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
EasyHire.me is its own company.ShowHide
The company
EasyHire.me is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI powered video interview platform
- For
- Recruiters
- Price stated
- free $0 / per job monthly; entry $49 / per job monthly; standard $99 / per job monthly; enterprise Custom subscription pricing easyhire.me
- Starting price
- 0 easyhire.me
- Free plan or trial
- Try it for free easyhire.me
- Integrations claimed
- 9 easyhire.me
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting, customers
What EasyHire.me's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: easyhire.me. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EasyHire.me's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EasyHire.me, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EasyHire.me by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where EasyHire.me is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name EasyHire.me, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.