Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 38% → 44%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
44%from 38% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 40, unchanged
2 categories · RankedHireflix
101Judge labels
27First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
43% in Video interviewing for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 34 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Hireflix →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 42
43%54 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market3 of 66
6%34 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 40
6%11 labels
criticized challenger
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Hireflix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 6% | 3 of 66 | 3% | 34 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 106 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Hireflix held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 4 of 38, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 5% | 5% | =heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 3 of 66 |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 106 of 142, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Hireflix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Hireflix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels8
Paraphrase20 labels7
Comparative22 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels10
Scale-constrained8 labels2
Negative10 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative101 labels in all, every segment counted; 27 of the 43 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Hireflix at a flat $75 a month with unlimited interviews is the strongest fit for most small teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“tools like Willo, Hireflix, VidCruiter, or Braintrust AIR, which get better candidate feedback” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · negative prompt · first choice
“Top Overall Pick for Startups/SMBs: Hireflix” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall budget pick: Hireflix” GPT-5.4 mini · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“very bare-bones — best for small teams / solo recruiters, not mid-sized orgs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hireflix, over the 101 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hireflix was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hireflix, over the 101 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hireflix was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hireflix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 101 answers that named Hireflix and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hiretruffle.com68
willo.video66
sparkhire.com51
selectsoftwarereviews.com46
hirevire.com44
resources.rework.com44
pin.com42
learn.g2.com41
linkedin.com40
hireflix.comYour site38
442 of the 480 domain citations in answers naming Hireflix came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hireflix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hireflix takes 6% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hireflix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hireflix takes 6% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“hireflix”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 50 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,390 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 287 · 20 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 758
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 3 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 27 across its categories
- Named in
- 101 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 101 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hireflix.com
179
subdomains included
Content
76
counted in the table below
Documentation
72
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 65 | 11 | 2026-09-03 | Video interviewing | |
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-07-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2023-01-24 | Video interviewing |
Most recent
- 2026-09-03Hireflix soc 2 type ii certified blog
- 2026-08-27Entry level interview questions to ask candidates blog
- 2026-08-25Email invitation templates one way interviews blog
- 2026-08-20Competency based interview questions blog
- 2026-08-17Skills based hiring guide blog
- 2026-08-13Campus recruitment blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hireflix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Hireflix
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Hireflix is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Hireflix is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- one-way video interview software
- For
- recruiters
- Price stated
- Monthly Cancel any time; Annual Save 50%; Small $75 per month (billed yearly); Medium $150 per month (billed yearly); Custom Best rates. Guaranteed. hireflix.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 75 hireflix.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try free for 1 month hireflix.com
- Integrations claimed
- 16 hireflix.com/integrations
- Certifications
- SOC 2 compliantGDPR compliant
- Customers named
- SoCal Counseling CenterCareer RockstarsVeterinary Emergency GroupPropel InternationalTutoreseCalo AppSkyengJust for Pets
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Hireflix's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hireflix.com, hireflix.com/pricing, hireflix.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hireflix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hireflix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hireflix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Hireflix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hireflix, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Hireflix is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Hireflix is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideHireflix is among the products AI models recommend first in Video interviewing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.