Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 7 of 40
1Way Interview
14Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Video interviewing for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 42
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 66
6%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named 1Way Interview for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 6% | 5 of 66 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, 1Way Interview held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 5% | 7% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 5 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated 1Way Interview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated 1Way Interview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels4
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For a company with a limited budget, 1Way Interview (also called One Way Interview) stands out as one of the best options” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: 1Way Interview — Best Overall for Budget-Conscious Companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“For most limited-budget companies, I recommend 1Way Interview” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Very Small Budgets ... Extremely affordable entry point with AI screening tools” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as 1Way Interview, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 1Way Interview was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as 1Way Interview, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 1Way Interview was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 1Way Interview. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named 1Way Interview and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
selectsoftwarereviews.com10
linkedin.com9
hackerearth.com7
jazzhr.com7
willo.video7
firsthr.app6
hirevire.com6
onewayinterview.com6
screenapp.io6
g2.com5
No domain is on file for 1Way Interview, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where 1Way Interview stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where 1Way Interview stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“1way interview”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 5 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as 1Way Interview
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 1Way Interview; a claim can dispute any of them.
1WayInterview 1
Follow 1Way Interview
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 1Way Interview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 1Way Interview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 1Way Interview by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where 1Way Interview is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name 1Way Interview, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.