AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Video interviewing › Hirevire vs myInterview
Video interviewing · October 2026 Edition

Hirevire vs myInterview

Zero of fourteen models named Hirevire first on the direct prompt; zero named myInterview. Hirevire was named by eleven of the fourteen models and myInterview by ten and Hirevire carries 15 labels and myInterview 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Hirevire

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

myInterview

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels1512A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Hirevire reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Spark Hire was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Spark Hire vs Hirevire · Spark Hire vs myInterview · Willo vs Hirevire

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video interviewing page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HirevireFirst choices, of fourteen modelsmyInterview
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained32
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Hirevire and myInterview were named in the same answer twelve times, of the 65 answers naming Hirevire and the 41 naming myInterview. In those answers myInterview took the first choice two times and Hirevire four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Hirevire and myInterview stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Hirevire myInterview first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Hirevire on the left and myInterview on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Hirevire and myInterview stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Spark Hire alternatives: HackerRank
GPT-5.4 miniSpark Hire alternatives: HireVue, VidCruiter
Gemini 3.5 FlashSpark Hire alternatives: BrightHire, Metaview, VidCruiter, Willo
Perplexity SonarSpark Hire alternatives: Rework, VidCruiter
Grok 4.1 FastSpark Hire alternatives: Hireflix, VidCruiter, Willo
Mistral SmallSpark Hire alternatives: Breezy HR, VidCruiter
DeepSeek V4 FlashSpark Hire alternatives: Willo
Llama 4 MaverickSpark Hire alternatives: VidCruiter
Qwen 3.7 FlashHireVue alternatives: Modern Hire, Spark Hire, Talmatic, VidCruiter
Kimi K2Spark Hire, interviewstream alternatives: Hireflix, VidCruiter
GLM 4.7 FlashXSpark Hire alternatives: Hireflix, Willo
MiniMax M2.5Spark Hire alternatives: VidCruiter, interviewstream
GPT-6 LunaSpark Hire alternatives: HireVue, VidCruiter
Muse Glimmer 30BSpark Hire alternatives: Breezy, VidCruiter

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
myInterview leads by two points.
myInterview8%#5 of 11
Hirevire6%#6 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Hirevire leads at mid-market.
Hirevire6%#4 of 9
myInterview4%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Hirevire0%#– of 6
myInterview0%#– of 6
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Hirevire

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“For the tightest budgets, Hirevire at $19/month offers the best value.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Hirevire - Best Overall Value ... Start with Hirevire ($39-49/month)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about myInterview

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“The best video interviewing platform for a company with a limited budget is myInterview, as it offers a genuine free tier” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“myInterview is likely your best choice” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Best to try for free: myInterview because it offers a genuine free tier” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.