Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 51 → 39 of 40
4 categories · RankedVidCruiter
161Judge labels
11First choices
37Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in Video interviewing for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 45 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of VidCruiter →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business41 of 42
0%27 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market9 of 66
2%45 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 40
21%54 labels
accepted challenger
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named VidCruiter for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 2% | 9 of 66 | 18% | 45 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 22 of 75 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 35 of 90 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 55 of 118 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, VidCruiter held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 8 of 63, unchanged
Enterprise▲+14Since September 2026: 11% → 24%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
24%from 11% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 2 of 38, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 55 of 118 |
| Video interviewing | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 9 of 66 |
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 22 of 75 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated VidCruiter across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated VidCruiter across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labels2
Paraphrase23 labels2
Comparative41 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels4
Scale-constrained19 labels3
Negative32 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative161 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“VidCruiter - A robust and customizable platform that offers both asynchronous and live interview solutions, along with advanced automation tools.” Llama 4 Maverick · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“HireVue and VidCruiter lead in enterprise‑grade AI assessments and compliance, with higher price points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Look for highly transparent, candidate-first platforms (like Willo or VidCruiter)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · first choice
“Enterprise and compliance-heavy hiring: choose HireVue or VidCruiter.” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“enterprise-weighted; custom quoting and more complexity than a mid-sized team typically needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if budget is tight: HireVue or VidCruiter” GPT-5.4 mini · Video interviewing · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-focused, custom pricing” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · hard negative
“VidCruiter can be overly complex for simple scheduling needs and may be too heavy for lightweight teams” Mistral Small · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as VidCruiter, over the 161 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VidCruiter was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as VidCruiter, over the 161 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VidCruiter was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named VidCruiter. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 159 of the 161 answers that named VidCruiter and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hiretruffle.com79
willo.video77
hirevire.com68
pin.com66
resources.rework.com60
sparkhire.com59
selectsoftwarereviews.com58
peoplemanagingpeople.com50
learn.g2.com49
firsthr.app44
610 of the 610 domain citations in answers naming VidCruiter came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
vidcruiter.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, VidCruiter takes 2% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
vidcruiter.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, VidCruiter takes 2% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“vidcruiter”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 21 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 18,866 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,067 · 80 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,049
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 11 across its categories
- Named in
- 161 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 159 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on vidcruiter.com
432
subdomains included
Content
149
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 17
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 100 | 2 | 2026-09-17 | Candidate assessment | |
| Case study | 17 | 0 | 2026-03-19 | ||
| News or press | 10 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | HRIS and HCM platforms, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2025-10-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2025-10-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-07 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2021-12-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17Talent acquisition certifications blog
- 2026-09-02Gcloud15 government award blog
- 2026-08-24Vidcruiter vs hirevue comparison
- 2026-04-13Asynchronous vs live video interviews comparison
- 2026-04-07How to resign from a job blog
- 2026-03-19Healthchannels case study
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 27, 2025 to October 29, 2025Gartner 2025 NA HR SymposiumOrlando · attended
As the event pages on vidcruiter.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page vidcruiter.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow VidCruiter
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
VidCruiter is its own company.ShowHide
The company
VidCruiter is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI recruiting software for enterprise and high-volume hiring teams
- For
- enterprise and high-volume hiring teams
- Price stated
- Get a price quote customized for your recruitment needs. vidcruiter.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27017ISO/IEC 27018SOC 2 Type II CertifiedISO 27001 CertifiedISO 27017 CertifiedISO 27018 Certified
- Hosting
- CanadaUSAEuropeUKAustralia
- Customers named
- Casey'sRacetracHealthChannelsElections BCGlobal Affairs CanadaAustralia’s Prime Minister & CabinetOregon Health AuthorityBlue Cross
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What VidCruiter's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: vidcruiter.com, vidcruiter.com/pricing, vidcruiter.com/security, vidcruiter.com/solutions, vidcruiter.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VidCruiter's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VidCruiter, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for VidCruiter by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where VidCruiter is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name VidCruiter, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.