Spark Hire vs myInterview
Thirteen of fourteen models named Spark Hire first on the direct prompt; zero named myInterview. Spark Hire was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and myInterview by ten and Spark Hire carries 57 labels and myInterview 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video interviewing page.
By framing
Spark HireFirst choices, of fourteen modelsmyInterview
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Spark Hire and myInterview were named in the same answer thirty-one times, of the 185 answers naming Spark Hire and the 41 naming myInterview. In those answers myInterview took the first choice three times and Spark Hire five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Spark Hire myInterview first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Spark Hire on the left and myInterview on the right.The direct prompt
Spark Hire first, myInterview not the choice
13 of 14 modelsmyInterview was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Spark Hire14%#2 of 11myInterview8%#5 of 11Spark Hire50%#1 of 9myInterview4%#5 of 9Spark Hire6%#3 of 6myInterview0%#– of 6What the models said about Spark Hire
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Platforms to Avoid on a Tight Budget | Spark Hire | ~$149-$299/month | Too expensive for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Strongly disliked by candidates who describe it as "humiliating" and "completely dehumanizing."” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Spark Hire is more feature-rich, but its plans start at $249/month billed annually, so it's harder to justify on a tight budget.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Spark Hire is the most widely adopted mid-market video interviewing platform, with transparent pricing and support for both one-way async and live formats.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd lean toward Spark Hire because it balances async screening capabilities, straightforward implementation, and reasonable pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best All-Rounder (Async + Live in One): Spark Hire ... Spark Hire is the industry standard for the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about myInterview
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“The best video interviewing platform for a company with a limited budget is myInterview, as it offers a genuine free tier” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“myInterview is likely your best choice” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Best to try for free: myInterview because it offers a genuine free tier” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.