| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 24% | 2 of 66 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 22% → 23%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 15% | 3 of 87 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 14%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 13% | 3 of 97 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19% | ▲+11Since September 2026: 2% → 13%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 11% | 4 of 78 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 11% → 11%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 11% | 3 of 85 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 4% | 7 of 108 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 4% | 10 of 98 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 2% | 13 of 142 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 2% | 15 of 93 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 10 of 114 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 18 of 95 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Benefits administration | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 62 of 67 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gusto at 20% | |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 72 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 84 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Payroll software | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 37 of 58 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 67 of 127 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR compliance | 2% | 13% | ▲+11Since September 2026: 2% → 13%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 3 of 97 |
| Performance management | 2% | 8% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 3 of 85 |
| Employee onboarding | 18% | 14% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 14%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 87, unchanged |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 65 → 13 of 142 |
| HR help desk | 2% | 5% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 7 of 108 |
| Workforce planning | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 of 98, unchanged |
| People analytics | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 10 of 114 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 15 of 93, unchanged |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | 22% | 23% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 22% → 23%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 66, unchanged |
| Workforce management sui | 11% | 11% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 11% → 11%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 78, unchanged |
| Leave | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 18 of 95 |
| Benefits administration | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 67, unchanged |
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 72 of 128, unchanged |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 84 of 95, unchanged |
| Payroll software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 58, unchanged |
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 115 → 67 of 127 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Zoho People is widely considered the most affordable option.... Choose Zoho People if you want to cut costs while retaining advanced automation features.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · first choice
“Zoho People – cheapest per-user HRIS with compliance modules ... It is the lowest per-employee cost of the mainstream compliance-capable HRIS options.” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR compliance · budget prompt · first choice
“It is the cheapest full-featured HRIS on the market... If you have 15+ desk employees and a tight budget: Choose Zoho People ($1.25/user).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HRIS and HCM platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“The best workforce management software for a company with a limited budget is Zoho People, as it is considered the best for businesses on a budget” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce management sui · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Suites to be cautious about: BambooHR, Zoho People ... often lack the heavy lifting required for true workforce management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative
“While its benefits module is lighter than Gusto/Zenefits, it is useful for budget-conscious companies” Muse Glimmer 30B · Benefits administration · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 277 of the 286 answers that named Zoho People and are not a share of its labels.
919 of the 919 domain citations in answers naming Zoho People came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Zoho People's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoho.com/people, zoho.com.cn/people, zoho.com/fr/people, zoho.com/de/people, zoho.com/jp/people. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho People's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho People, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho People by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Zoho People is among the products AI models recommend first in HRIS and HCM platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Zoho People is among the products AI models recommend first in Employee onboarding this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Zoho People is among the products AI models recommend first in HR compliance and policy management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Zoho People is among the products AI models recommend first in Performance management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.