Every category where a model named Zoho Learn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Learning management systems	Learning and development	4%	7 of 61	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51%	▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	22 of 89	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	47 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Zoho Learn held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Learning management syst · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

4%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 2 of 50

Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

4%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 6 of 55

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Learning management syst	2%	4%	▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 8 → 7 of 61
Learning experience plat	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 21 → 22 of 89
Online course libraries	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 65 → 47 of 95

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Zoho Learn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained18 labels4

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with the free tier of TalentLMS, Zoho Learn, ProProfs Training Maker, or Coursebox” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“Zoho Learn — *Best Overall Value* ... The lowest entry point of any serious LMS.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“very affordable for small teams, with a free version for up to 5 users” GPT-5.4 mini · Learning management syst · budget prompt · alternative

“Zoho Learn starts at $1 per user per month (with a 5-user minimum)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Learn, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Learn was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentLMS39 of 4429Not among the top eight

Moodle23 of 440Not among the top eight

Trainual18 of 442Not among the top eight

iSpring Learn17 of 441Not among the top eight

LearnWorlds15 of 441Not among the top eight

Connecteam14 of 440Not among the top eight

GoSkills11 of 444Not among the top eight

Easy LMS10 of 440Not among the top eight

360Learning8 of 440Not among the top eight

Google Classroom8 of 440Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Learn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 44 answers that named Zoho Learn and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

talentlms.com34

capterra.com33

goskills.com33

forbes.com24

ispring.com22

learnworlds.com17

g2.com14

proprofstraining.com13

group.app9

learn.g2.com9

208 of the 208 domain citations in answers naming Zoho Learn came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

capterra.com/resources/best-lms-for-small-business33

talentlms.com/blog/lms-small-business26

forbes.com/advisor/business/the-best-learning-management-systems22

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-small-business20

goskills.com/resources/affordable-lms15

ispring.com/knowledge-hub/best-lmss-for-small-business15

talentlms.com/blog/most-affordable-lms15

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Zoho Learn stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“zoho learn”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 52 a month
Its own site: It sits on Zoho's site (zoho.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 61 in learning management syst

Segment leader

51%

TalentLMS

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 44 answers
Its own site cited: in 44 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Zoho Learn

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Zoho is the company behind Zoho Learn.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Zoho: Zoho Analytics, Zoho Bookings, Zoho CRM, Zoho Cliq, Zoho Connect, Zoho Desk, Zoho Desk + Zoho People, Zoho Payroll and 5 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Knowledge management and LMS platform
zoho.com/learn
For: businesses
zoho.com/learn
Free plan or trial: Sign Up for Free; 7-day free trial. No credit card required. zoho.com/learn
Certifications: GDPRHIPAA
Hosting: US
Customers named: Education & Outreach CompanyCommon Goals SoftwareNETRUST PTE LTD
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations

What Zoho Learn's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoho.com/learn. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Learn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Learn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho Learn by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Zoho Learn is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zoho Learn, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.