Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 17% → 18%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 67
Lattice · 19 categories · RankedLattice
712Judge labels
121First choices
156Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
19Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
43% in Performance management for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 85 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
12 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 56 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Lattice →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 67
16%52 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 85
43%56 labels
endorsed leader
Enterprise3 of 94
19%48 labels
criticized challenger
In performance management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lattice for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 43% | 1 of 85 | 11% | 56 | endorsed leader | ▲+2Since September 2026: 41% → 43%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 34% | 1 of 73 | 2% | 48 | endorsed leader | ▼−5Since September 2026: 40% → 35%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 28% | 1 of 93 | 11% | 36 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 31% → 30%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 13% | 3 of 68 | 13% | 38 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 11% → 15%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee engagement surveys | Onboarding and employee experience | 10% | 4 of 58 | 6% | 31 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 9% | 5 of 128 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 6% | 7 of 142 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation benchmarking data | Compensation and total rewards | 2% | 10 of 148 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 20 of 114 | 10% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 19 of 75 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% | |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 53 of 66 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 87 of 95 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recognition and rewards | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 36 of 98 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 32 of 98 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 68 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Employee wellbeing and mental health | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 86 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 52 of 97 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 50 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Teams at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 38 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lattice held within the floor in all nineteen categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Performance management · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 41% → 43%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
43%from 41% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 1 of 76, unchanged
Enterprise▲+9Since September 2026: 12% → 21%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
21%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 3 of 89, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching platforms | 2% | 10% | ▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 5 of 128 |
| 360 feedback | 40% | 35% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 40% → 35%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 73, unchanged |
| Goals and OKRs | 11% | 15% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 11% → 15%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 68 |
| People analytics | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 20 of 114 |
| Compensation benchmarkin | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 67 → 10 of 148 |
| Employee engagement surv | 10% | 12% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 58, unchanged |
| HR AI assistants | 6% | 4% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 7 of 142 |
| Performance management | 41% | 43% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 41% → 43%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 85, unchanged |
| Succession planning | 31% | 30% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 31% → 30%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 93, unchanged |
| Employee monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 19 of 75, unchanged |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 53 of 66 |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 63 → 87 of 95 |
| Recognition and rewards | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 36 of 98 |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 58 → 32 of 98 |
| Employee onboarding | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 91 → 68 of 87 |
| Employee wellbeing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 86 of 111, unchanged |
| HR compliance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 59 → 52 of 97 |
| Internal communications | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 86, unchanged |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lattice across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lattice across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 18 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 12 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 29 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 4 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 8 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 28 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 15 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 6 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 23 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 5 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 13 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 10 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 29 |
| Kimi K2 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 23 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 7 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 22 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 20 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 13 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 19 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct165 labels56
Paraphrase136 labels45
Comparative155 labels11not counted in share
Budget-constrained79 labels7
Scale-constrained99 labels13
Negative78 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative712 labels in all, every segment counted; 121 of the 133 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Widely considered the market leader for mid-sized, high-growth tech and professional services companies. Outstanding UX, great Slack integration, and excellent analytics.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Performance management · scale prompt · first choice
“Lattice - A people management platform... best for mid-market and enterprise HR teams managing performance, goals, engagement, and compensation in one place.” Llama 4 Maverick · Succession planning · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Lattice: Best Overall for Usability & Modern B2B Alignment... the default choice for mid-market technology, SaaS, and professional services B2B companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Performance management · direct prompt · first choice
“Lattice (G2: 4.7/5 from 3,800+ reviews...) Balances OKRs with performance reviews... Great for scaling alignment in sales-driven B2B teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“I wouldn’t choose Lattice on a tight budget just for OKRs: its pricing page lists an annual minimum agreement of $4,000.” GPT-6 Luna · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget - Lattice... minimum commitments make it poor for tight budgets” Kimi K2 · Performance management · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid platforms with $4,000+ annual minimums like Lattice/Culture Amp” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid "Enterprise Trap" Tools Platforms like Culture Amp, Lattice” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lattice, over the 712 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lattice was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lattice, over the 712 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lattice was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lattice. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 662 of the 712 answers that named Lattice and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com260
betterworks.com248
workhuman.com248
engagedly.com173
guideflow.com170
firsthr.app167
feedbackpulse.com158
g2.com145
lattice.comYour site145
resources.rework.com134
1,703 of the 1,848 domain citations in answers naming Lattice came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Lattice stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Lattice stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “performance management software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “performance management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90,500 a month (“lattice”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13,900 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 122,123 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,750 · 1,242 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,061
- Paid Google search
- 7 searches its ads show for, about 38 clicks and $1,328 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
43%
rank 1 of 85 in performance management
First choices
121
across its categories
- Named in
- 712 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 662 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lattice.com
2,290
subdomains included
Content
1,886
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
47 · 26
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,132 | 8 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 248 | 2 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Template or tool | 242 | 2 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Case study | 78 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 74 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 42 | 0 | 2021-06-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 30 | 0 | 2026-01-23 | ||
| Comparison | 25 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | 0 | 2023-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 4 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-245 steps for effectively communicating engagement survey results with your team blog
- 2026-09-23Okr 101 blog
- 2026-09-21Hr guide mcps blog
- 2026-09-18Ai fluency competencies template template or tool
- 2026-09-17Managers heres how to have conversations about pay blog
- 2026-09-09How to have successful employee development conversations blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lattice.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Lattice
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lattice; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lattice AI 2HiBob / Lattice AI 1Lattice Goals & OKRs 1
Follow Lattice
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lattice is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lattice is its own company.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Lattice
- Lattice Analytics, Lattice Compensate, Lattice Compensation
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The HR platform that people love
- For
- HR and AI tools to manage people and performance; employees, managers, and companies
- Price stated
- $13 seat/month; Enterprise pricing varies based on seats, complexity, and scale; Performance and Goals & OKRs can be unbundled and purchased individually for $8/month; minimum annual agreement is $4,000; Lattice bills all contracts annually lattice.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $4 seat/month lattice.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Take a free tour lattice.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 CertifiedSOC 2 Type II Certified
- Hosting
- USEUFrankfurt, GermanyDublin, Ireland
- Customers named
- GoCardlessWeaveHugeBarkVantage West Credit UnionLiveRampUSAirtoursUNREAL Snacks
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Lattice's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lattice.com, lattice.com/pricing, lattice.com/trust/faqs, lattice.com/platform, lattice.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lattice's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lattice, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lattice by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lattice is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lattice, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Lattice is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Lattice is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHidePerformance management
AI models recommend Lattice first in Performance management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
360 feedback
AI models recommend Lattice first in 360 feedback this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Succession planning
AI models recommend Lattice first in Succession planning this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Goals and OKRs
Lattice is among the products AI models recommend first in Goals and OKRs this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.