| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 13% | 3 of 78 | 26% | 19 | criticized challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 15% → 11%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 12% | 2 of 98 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 10% | 5 of 86 | 6% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 6% | 5 of 108 | 3% | 29 | accepted challenger | ▼−8Since September 2026: 15% → 7%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Earned wage access | Compensation and total rewards | 2% | 10 of 54 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Tapcheck at 38% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now. |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 12 of 97 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 2% | 11 of 87 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 2% | 12 of 65 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 20 of 106 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 14 of 66 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 24 of 75 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 47 of 95 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Payroll software | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 28 of 58 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 65 of 75 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% | |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 107 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 73 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 45 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 55 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR compliance | 8% | 0% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 12 of 97 |
| Workforce scheduling | 15% | 7% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 15% → 7%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 5 of 108 |
| Workforce planning | 17% | 12% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 98, unchanged |
| Workforce management sui | 15% | 11% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 15% → 11%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 78, unchanged |
| Earned wage access | 0% | 3% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now. | New this edition | Rank 10 of 54, unchanged |
| Leave | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 47 of 95 |
| Applicant tracking syste | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 12 of 65 |
| Time and attendance | 10% | 9% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 5 of 86 |
| Employee onboarding | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 11 of 87 |
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 20 of 106 |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 14 of 66 |
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 75, unchanged |
| Payroll software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 58, unchanged |
| Employee monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 65 of 75, unchanged |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 107 of 142, unchanged |
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 70 → 73 of 108 |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 85, unchanged |
| Staffing agency tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 17 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“likely to be a cloud-based software that offers a free or low-cost plan, such as Homebase or TimeCamp. Homebase offers a free plan with basic features” Llama 4 Maverick · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually Homebase if you have a small, single-location team, or Connecteam if you want a free or very low-cost option” Perplexity Sonar · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“For most budget-constrained companies, Homebase (if you have an hourly workforce) or Zoho People ... offer the best value.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · budget prompt · first choice
“This is an affordable workforce management solution for small businesses ... with a free plan that makes it especially attractive” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce management sui · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Small-business / lightweight tools like Homebase, When I Work, Connecteam, Deputy, and similar SMB-first tools” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Homebase – Too small and US-centric for mid-market B2B.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · hard negative
“Homebase is 100% negative, 4 of 4 labels negative” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Homebase (free for up to 10 but more scheduling-focused)... have caps or shift to paid quickly.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee monitoring · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 404 of the 412 answers that named Homebase and are not a share of its labels.
1,147 of the 1,364 domain citations in answers naming Homebase came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,661 | 13 | 2026-09-23 | Payroll software, Workforce scheduling | |
| Glossary or explainer | 917 | 0 | 2026-06-08 | Payroll software, Time and attendance | |
| Comparison | 146 | 6 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Case study | 57 | 0 | 2022-12-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 49 | 1 | 2026-08-28 | Employee onboarding | |
| Conference or event | 16 | 0 | 2025-12-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page joinhomebase.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Homebase's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: joinhomebase.com, joinhomebase.com/pricing, trust.joinhomebase.com, joinhomebase.com/customers, joinhomebase.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Homebase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Homebase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Homebase by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Homebase is among the products AI models recommend first in Workforce management suites this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Homebase is among the products AI models recommend first in Workforce planning this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.