AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Homebase · October 2026 Edition
18 categories · Ranked

Homebase

412Judge labels
94First choices
33Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
18Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
45% in Workforce management sui for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 78 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 26% of its 19 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Homebase →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Homebase for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Workforce management suitesCore HR and payroll13%3 of 7826%19criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 15% → 11%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics12%2 of 980%10accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Time and attendanceCore HR and payroll10%5 of 866%17accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll6%5 of 1083%29accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 15% → 7%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Earned wage accessCompensation and total rewards2%10 of 540%6under 10 labels · led by Tapcheck at 38%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now.
HR compliance and policy managementCore HR and payroll2%12 of 970%5under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19%▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience2%11 of 870%6under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Applicant tracking systemsTalent acquisition2%12 of 650%2under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience0%20 of 1060%5under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HRIS and HCM platformsCore HR and payroll0%14 of 660%5under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition0%24 of 750%3under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Leave and absence managementCore HR and payroll0%47 of 9533%3under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Payroll softwareCore HR and payroll0%28 of 580%2under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 20%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Employee monitoringWorkforce planning and analytics0%65 of 75100%1under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33%
HR AI assistantsOnboarding and employee experience0%107 of 1420%1under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
HR help desk and case managementOnboarding and employee experience0%73 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Performance managementPerformance and talent management0%45 of 850%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Staffing agency platformsTalent acquisition0%55 of 1360%1under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22%

Movement

Since September 2026, Homebase held within the floor in all eighteen categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Workforce management sui · by segment

Small business▲+26Since September 2026: 16% → 42%, +26 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
42%from 16% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 13 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 71
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 15% → 11%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 71
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 68 → 13 of 70

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
HR compliance8%0%▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 6 → 12 of 97
Workforce scheduling15%7%▼−8Since September 2026: 15% → 7%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 → 5 of 108
Workforce planning17%12%▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 of 98, unchanged
Workforce management sui15%11%▼−4Since September 2026: 15% → 11%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 3 of 78, unchanged
Earned wage access0%3%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now.New this editionRank 10 of 54, unchanged
Leave2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 → 47 of 95
Applicant tracking syste0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 18 → 12 of 65
Time and attendance10%9%▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 4 → 5 of 86
Employee onboarding2%2%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 7 → 11 of 87
Frontline employee apps0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 20 of 106
HRIS and HCM platforms0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 14 of 66
Interview scheduling0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 24 of 75, unchanged
Payroll software0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 28 of 58, unchanged
Employee monitoring0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 65 of 75, unchanged
HR AI assistants0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 107 of 142, unchanged
HR help desk0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 70 → 73 of 108
Performance management0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 45 of 85, unchanged
Staffing agency tools0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 55 of 136, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Homebase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.513004
GPT-5.4 mini13004
Gemini 3.5 Flash1100112
Perplexity Sonar33118
Grok 4.1 Fast474217
Mistral Small32218
DeepSeek V4 Flash252110
Llama 4 Maverick11114
Qwen 3.7 Flash31217
Kimi K2362011
GLM 4.7 FlashX173011
MiniMax M2.511204
GPT-6 Luna32005
Muse Glimmer 30B263112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct44 labels8
Paraphrase39 labels17
Comparative82 labels37not counted in share
Budget-constrained165 labels63
Scale-constrained28 labels6
Negative54 labels22not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative412 labels in all, every segment counted; 94 of the 153 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“likely to be a cloud-based software that offers a free or low-cost plan, such as Homebase or TimeCamp. Homebase offers a free plan with basic features” Llama 4 Maverick · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually Homebase if you have a small, single-location team, or Connecteam if you want a free or very low-cost option” Perplexity Sonar · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“For most budget-constrained companies, Homebase (if you have an hourly workforce) or Zoho People ... offer the best value.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · budget prompt · first choice
“This is an affordable workforce management solution for small businesses ... with a free plan that makes it especially attractive” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce management sui · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Small-business / lightweight tools like Homebase, When I Work, Connecteam, Deputy, and similar SMB-first tools” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Homebase – Too small and US-centric for mid-market B2B.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · hard negative
“Homebase is 100% negative, 4 of 4 labels negative” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Homebase (free for up to 10 but more scheduling-focused)... have caps or shift to paid quickly.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee monitoring · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Homebase, over the 412 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Homebase was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Deputy143 of 41211Compare →
BambooHR79 of 41213Not among the top eight
Gusto78 of 41221Not among the top eight
Sling72 of 41217Compare →
7shifts62 of 4120Not among the top eight
UKG Pro51 of 41210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Homebase. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 404 of the 412 answers that named Homebase and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

joinhomebase.comYour site217
peoplemanagingpeople.com197
forbes.com164
guideflow.com163
firsthr.app158
g2.com117
connecteam.com103
capterra.com101
fitsmallbusiness.com80
selectsoftwarereviews.com64

1,147 of the 1,364 domain citations in answers naming Homebase came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

joinhomebase.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Homebase takes 13% of first choices and Rippling takes 17%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “wfm suites”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workforce management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
201,000 a month (“homebase”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3,839 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 472,253 a month
Searches its site ranks for
77,515 · 1,207 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,961
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 28 clicks and $793 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 107 video, 7 text, 6 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as Pioneer Works, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 118 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
13%
rank 3 of 78 in workforce management sui
Segment leader
17%
Rippling
First choices
94 across its categories
Named in
412 answers
Its own site cited
in 404 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on joinhomebase.com
9,165
subdomains included
Content
2,850
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 34
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,661132026-09-23Payroll software, Workforce scheduling
Glossary or explainer91702026-06-08Payroll software, Time and attendance
Comparison14662026-09-21
Case study5702022-12-19
Template or tool4912026-08-28Employee onboarding
Conference or event1602025-12-17
Webinar or virtual event3undated
Report or ebook1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page joinhomebase.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Homebase

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Homebase; a claim can dispute any of them.
Homebase/Rain 1

Follow Homebase

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Homebase is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
All-in-one employee scheduling, time clocks, payroll, & more
For
small businesses with hourly teams
Price stated
Basic $0; Essentials $24; Plus $56; All-in-One $96 joinhomebase.com
Starting price
0 joinhomebase.com
Free plan or trial
Free to get started, no credit card required; 14-day Homebase free trial joinhomebase.com
Integrations claimed
17 joinhomebase.com/integrations
Certifications
CCPANIST CSFPCI DSS v4.0.0PIPEDASOC 2 Type 2SOC 3
Customers named
Plato's ClosetGreen & BisqueButter BakerGustoADPLightspeed CommerceSquareShopify.com
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Homebase's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: joinhomebase.com, joinhomebase.com/pricing, trust.joinhomebase.com, joinhomebase.com/customers, joinhomebase.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Homebase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Homebase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Homebase by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Homebase is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Homebase, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at joinhomebase.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Homebase is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide
Workforce management suites

Homebase is among the products AI models recommend first in Workforce management suites this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Workforce management suites, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/core/workforce-management-suites/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/homebase--workforce-management-suites-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Workforce management suites, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Workforce management suites standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Workforce management suites, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/core/workforce-management-suites/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/homebase--workforce-management-suites-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Workforce management suites, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Workforce management suites standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Workforce management suites, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/core/workforce-management-suites/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/homebase--workforce-management-suites-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Workforce management suites, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Workforce management suites standing, where the claim can be checked.

Workforce planning

Homebase is among the products AI models recommend first in Workforce planning this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Workforce planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/workforce-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/homebase--workforce-planning-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Workforce planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Workforce planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Workforce planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/workforce-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/homebase--workforce-planning-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Workforce planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Workforce planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Workforce planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/planning/workforce-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/homebase--workforce-planning-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Workforce planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Workforce planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.