| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 9% | 4 of 85 | 4% | 50 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 9% | 4 of 128 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 4% | 8 of 73 | 6% | 35 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 2% | 12 of 93 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 16 of 68 | 6% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 44 of 140 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 54 of 66 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 36 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 39 of 114 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recognition and rewards | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 53 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 16 of 68 |
| Coaching platforms | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 4 of 128 |
| People analytics | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 39 of 114 |
| 360 feedback | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 8 of 73 |
| Succession planning | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 12 of 93 |
| Performance management | 7% | 8% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 85, unchanged |
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 44 of 140 |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 54 of 66 |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 95, unchanged |
| Recognition and rewards | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 53 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 16 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 15 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 14 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Both platforms are well-suited for mid-market B2B companies... 15Five excelling in employee engagement and regular feedback” Mistral Small · Performance management · direct prompt · first choice
“Winner: 15Five 15Five is widely considered the gold standard for affordable, user-friendly continuous coaching.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with 15Five given its extremely low starting price of $4/user/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“Start here: Demo Lattice or 15Five—they dominate mid-market lists and suit B2B workflows.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Performance management · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Steer clear of Lattice/15Five/BambooHR if budget-tight” Grok 4.1 Fast · Performance management · budget prompt · hard negative
“Using 15Five for OKRs can inadvertently shift the focus from *strategic growth* to *employee evaluation*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reported limitations: Managers can't do group check-ins... Limited engagement survey customization” Kimi K2 · 360 feedback · negative prompt · soft negative
“$11 per user per month, billed annually, which can be expensive if 360s are all you need” GPT-6 Luna · 360 feedback · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 296 of the 327 answers that named 15Five and are not a share of its labels.
892 of the 892 domain citations in answers naming 15Five came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 717 | 5 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 192 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 51 | undated | |||
| Case study | 34 | 0 | 2017-03-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 0 | 2026-06-29 | ||
| Podcast or video | 14 | 0 | 2025-08-27 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2025-12-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 0 | 2025-02-13 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2023-06-29 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page 15five.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What 15Five's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: 15five.com, 15five.com/pricing, trust.15five.com, 15five.com/products/kona, 15five.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 15Five's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 15Five, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 15Five by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: