AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › 15Five · October 2026 Edition
10 categories · Ranked

15Five

327Judge labels
32First choices
53Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
10Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in Performance management for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 85 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 50 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of 15Five →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In performance management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 15Five for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Performance managementPerformance and talent management9%4 of 854%50accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Coaching platformsLearning and development9%4 of 1280%11accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
360 feedbackPerformance and talent management4%8 of 736%35accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Succession planningPerformance and talent management2%12 of 930%7under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Goals and OKRsPerformance and talent management0%16 of 686%18accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Compensation managementCompensation and total rewards0%44 of 1400%2under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HRIS and HCM platformsCore HR and payroll0%54 of 66100%1under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Org charts and org designWorkforce planning and analytics0%36 of 950%1under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
People analyticsWorkforce planning and analytics0%39 of 1140%1under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22%▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Recognition and rewardsOnboarding and employee experience0%53 of 980%1under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 29%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, 15Five held within the floor in all ten categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Performance management · by segment

Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 3 of 67
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 76
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 15 of 89

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Goals and OKRs4%0%▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 → 16 of 68
Coaching platforms2%6%▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 → 4 of 128
People analytics4%0%▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 → 39 of 114
360 feedback0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 17 → 8 of 73
Succession planning2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 → 12 of 93
Performance management7%8%▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 4 of 85, unchanged
Compensation management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 49 → 44 of 140
HRIS and HCM platforms0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 28 → 54 of 66
Org charts0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 36 of 95, unchanged
Recognition and rewards0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 53 of 98, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated 15Five across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.5155011
GPT-5.4 mini00202
Gemini 3.5 Flash06107
Perplexity Sonar03126
Grok 4.1 Fast1113116
Mistral Small11406
DeepSeek V4 Flash087015
Llama 4 Maverick02204
Qwen 3.7 Flash191112
Kimi K2481114
GLM 4.7 FlashX04206
MiniMax M2.5064010
GPT-6 Luna560112
Muse Glimmer 30B02406

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct61 labels13
Paraphrase63 labels10
Comparative64 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained45 labels7
Scale-constrained52 labels2
Negative42 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative327 labels in all, every segment counted; 32 of the 42 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Both platforms are well-suited for mid-market B2B companies... 15Five excelling in employee engagement and regular feedback” Mistral Small · Performance management · direct prompt · first choice
“Winner: 15Five 15Five is widely considered the gold standard for affordable, user-friendly continuous coaching.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with 15Five given its extremely low starting price of $4/user/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“Start here: Demo Lattice or 15Five—they dominate mid-market lists and suit B2B workflows.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Performance management · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Steer clear of Lattice/15Five/BambooHR if budget-tight” Grok 4.1 Fast · Performance management · budget prompt · hard negative
“Using 15Five for OKRs can inadvertently shift the focus from *strategic growth* to *employee evaluation*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reported limitations: Managers can't do group check-ins... Limited engagement survey customization” Kimi K2 · 360 feedback · negative prompt · soft negative
“$11 per user per month, billed annually, which can be expensive if 360s are all you need” GPT-6 Luna · 360 feedback · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 15Five, over the 327 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 15Five was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Lattice259 of 32757Compare →
Betterworks104 of 32715Not among the top eight
BambooHR97 of 3279Not among the top eight
Workday HCM Performance Management50 of 3276Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors48 of 3271Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 15Five. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 296 of the 327 answers that named 15Five and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

15five.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, 15Five takes 9% of first choices and Lattice takes 43%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “performance management software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “performance management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
6,600 a month (“15five”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
32 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 32,362 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,636 · 174 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,905
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
39 ads · 38 text, 1 video · 22 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as 15Five, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 26 in the year, 13 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
9%
rank 4 of 85 in performance management
Segment leader
43%
Lattice
First choices
32 across its categories
Named in
327 answers
Its own site cited
in 296 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on 15five.com
1,136
subdomains included
Content
1,046
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
33 · 2
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog71752026-09-22
Webinar or virtual event192undated
Report or ebook51undated
Case study3402017-03-16
Glossary or explainer1702026-06-29
Podcast or video1402025-08-27
Comparison1002025-12-18
Conference or event702025-02-13
Template or tool302023-06-29
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page 15five.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as 15Five

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 15Five; a claim can dispute any of them.
15Five Perform 5

Follow 15Five

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

15Five is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI-powered performance management platform built for business impact
For
mid-market and enterprise organizations
Price stated
15Five offers three annual pricing plans, along with 3 impactful add-ons. Engage is $4 per user per month. Perform is $11 per user per month. Total Platform plan is $16 per user per month. 15five.com
Starting price
4 15five.com
Certifications
Enterprise-grade securityCCPAGDPRPIPEDASOC 2SOC 3TX-RAMP Level 2VPAT
Customers named
AurorKreg ToolsTagboardReUp EducationPendoPennroseFintech PEXNational Carwash Solutions
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What 15Five's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: 15five.com, 15five.com/pricing, trust.15five.com, 15five.com/products/kona, 15five.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 15Five's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 15Five, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 15Five by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where 15Five is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name 15Five, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 15five.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.