AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Google Meet · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Google Meet

23Judge labels
2First choices
7Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Video interviewing for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Meet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Video interviewingTalent acquisition2%11 of 6633%9under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience0%87 of 106100%1under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Google Meet held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Video interviewing · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 11 of 40
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 20 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 → 34 of 38

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Video interviewing0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 14 → 11 of 66
Frontline employee apps0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 79 → 87 of 106

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Google Meet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best budget choice: use Google Meet for live interviews. It costs nothing for basic use” GPT-6 Luna · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Zoom or Google Meet — completely free for live video interviews” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
“more widely trusted by users include Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · alternative
“If you use Google Workspace, Google Meet is effectively free.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams (personal accounts)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · negative prompt · hard negative
“such as Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, or Skype, if the company relies on them without consistent process, structured questions, and clear evaluation criteria” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative
“lack recruiting-specific features like structured evaluation, ATS integration, and automated workflows” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Free tools like Zoom/Google Meet work for basic live calls but lack recruiting features” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Meet, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Meet was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zoom20 of 230Not among the top eight
Spark Hire12 of 231Not among the top eight
Willo12 of 231Not among the top eight
Hireflix11 of 236Not among the top eight
Microsoft Teams10 of 230Not among the top eight
HireVue8 of 231Not among the top eight
EasyHire.me7 of 234Not among the top eight
Hirevire6 of 233Not among the top eight
myInterview6 of 232Not among the top eight
1Way Interview5 of 232Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Meet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Google Meet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

willo.video14
hiretruffle.com11
linkedin.com10
selectsoftwarereviews.com10
hackerearth.com9
hirevire.com9
jazzhr.com9
g2.com8
getapp.com8
resources.rework.com8

Ninety-six of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming Google Meet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

google.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Google Meet takes 2% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,830,000 a month (“google meet”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
14,073 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,800,358,416 a month
Searches its site ranks for
16,240,774 · 2,471,277 in the top three
Sites linking to it
28,655,444
Paid Google search
243 searches its ads show for, about 42,266 clicks and $465,944 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
5+ ads · 2 image, 2 text, 1 video · 5 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as Google LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 5 in the year. 115 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
23 answers
Its own site cited
in 23 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on google.com
7,607
subdomains included
Content
1,201
counted in the table below
Documentation
137
Product · Integration
18 · 84
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Case study707undated
Blog37202018-12-13
Glossary or explainer5102018-12-13
Comparison35undated
News or press34undated
Template or tool1undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page google.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Google Meet

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Meet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Meet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Meet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Google Meet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Meet, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.