Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 70 → 19 of 67
1 category · RankedGoodTime
155Judge labels
41First choices
38Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
55% in Interview scheduling for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 49 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of GoodTime →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business20 of 69
2%38 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market2 of 75
16%49 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 75
55%63 labels
endorsed leader
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named GoodTime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 16% | 2 of 75 | 18% | 49 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, GoodTime held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment
Mid-market▲+7Since September 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 2 of 73
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 56% → 51%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
51%from 56% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 72, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 9% | 16% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 2 of 75 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated GoodTime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated GoodTime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labels15
Paraphrase10 labels5
Comparative36 labels17not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels8
Scale-constrained26 labels13
Negative34 labels8not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative155 labels in all, every segment counted; 41 of the 66 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“look toward standalone partners like Goodtime or Gem as they are designed specifically for the volume and complexity typical of 500-person companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Interview scheduling · scale prompt · first choice
“Platforms like candidate.fyi, GoodTime, and ModernLoop are specifically designed to handle complex, multi-stage panel loops” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · scale prompt · first choice
“For complex panels, frequent rescheduling, or lots of recruiting coordination, compare GoodTime and ModernLoop.” GPT-6 Luna · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice
“GoodTime is the go-to for large enterprises needing complex, AI-driven multi-panel orchestration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to avoid if on a tight budget: Enterprise-level tools like GoodTime or ModernLoop” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · hard negative
“Users report technical issues, including frequent crashes, missing time slots, and incorrect calendar availability display.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caveat: It has a steeper price tag (often starting around $15,000 to $40,000/year) and a longer implementation curve” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“you don't need to spend thousands of dollars on enterprise-grade recruiting software like GoodTime or ModernLoop” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GoodTime, over the 155 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoodTime was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GoodTime, over the 155 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoodTime was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GoodTime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 149 of the 155 answers that named GoodTime and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cal.com88
lever.co85
goodtime.ioYour site72
sapia.ai69
peoplemanagingpeople.com59
metaview.ai53
firsthr.app51
intervue.io50
calendly.com46
selectsoftwarereviews.com44
545 of the 617 domain citations in answers naming GoodTime came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
goodtime.io ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GoodTime takes 16% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
goodtime.io ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GoodTime takes 16% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “interview scheduling tools”
7
Position for “interview scheduling software”
4
- Searches for its name, Google
- 135,000 a month (“goodtime”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 614 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,435 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,024 · 40 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,307
- Paid Google search
- 4 searches its ads show for, about 28 clicks and $1,627 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 2 of 75 in interview scheduling
Segment leader
20%
Calendly
- First choices
- 41 across its categories
- Named in
- 155 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 149 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on goodtime.io
962
subdomains included
Content
427
counted in the table below
Documentation
404
Product · Integration
34 · 12
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 289 | 13 | 2026-09-18 | Interview scheduling, AI recruiting assistants | |
| News or press | 41 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | Interview scheduling | |
| Case study | 31 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 21 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2025-10-13 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | undated | Interview scheduling | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Goodtime product updates whats new from september 2026 blog
- 2026-09-17What agentic ai in talent acquisition should look like blog
- 2026-09-11Kinaxis case study
- 2026-09-10Spicy ta takes kyle lagunas and hung lee face off blog
- 2026-09-03Roundtable recap what ta leaders discussed offstage at moment 2026 blog
- 2026-08-17Best interview scheduling software blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- August 25, 2026 to August 27, 2026Moment 2026Cavallo Point, Sausalito, US · hosted
As the event pages on goodtime.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page goodtime.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as GoodTime
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GoodTime; a claim can dispute any of them.
GoodTime (GoodTime Hire) 1GoodTime.io 1Goodtime 1
Follow GoodTime
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GoodTime is its own company.ShowHide
The company
GoodTime is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Smarter Interview Scheduling, Better Experiences
- For
- Chief People Officer; Chief Human Resources Officer; VP of Talent Acquisition; Director of Talent Acquisition; Recruiting operations leaders; Talent operations leaders
- Price stated
- Pricing is based on the number of candidates annually, not the number of users. You can have as many users as you need. We’d be happy to prepare a customized proposal for you! goodtime.io/pricing/hire
- Free plan or trial
- for free goodtime.io/security
- Integrations claimed
- 8 goodtime.io · 5 goodtime.io/products/meet pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000)SOC 3ISO 42001GDPRCCPAGoodTime ISO42001 CertificateGoodTime Hire Pen Test CertificateGoodTime Meet Pen Test Certificate
- Hosting
- European Union
- Customers named
- LyftSlackRed HatGlovoShopifyHubSpotPricelineHelloFresh
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price
What GoodTime's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: goodtime.io, goodtime.io/pricing/hire, goodtime.io/security, goodtime.io/products/meet, goodtime.io/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GoodTime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GoodTime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GoodTime by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GoodTime is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GoodTime, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where GoodTime is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where GoodTime is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideGoodTime is among the products AI models recommend first in Interview scheduling this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.